Inhibition by transmembrane peptides of chimeric insulin receptors

Receptor tyrosine kinases play essential roles in cell proliferation and differentiation. We have recently shown that peptides corresponding to the transmembrane domains of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) and ErbB2 receptors inhibit their corresponding receptor activation in cancer cell lines. We extend this observation to cells transfected with chimeric insulin receptors where the transmembrane domain has been replaced by that of the EGF receptor or a mutated Erb2 domain. Peptides corresponding to the transmembrane domains of the EGF receptor and ErbB2 are able to inhibit specifically the autophosphorylation of insulin receptors with the corresponding domain. This inhibitory effect is correlated with the propensity of the different transmembrane domains to self-associate in a genetic reporter assay. Thus, our data strengthen the notion that transmembrane domains are involved in erbB receptor activation, and that these receptors can be modulated by inhibiting proteinprotein interactions within the membrane.Received 25 May 2005; received after revision 13 July 2005; accepted 22 July 2005     

The <Emphasis Type="Italic">Adhesion</Emphasis> GPCRs: A unique family of G protein-coupled receptors with important roles in both central and peripheral tissues

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a diverse superfamily of membrane-bound receptors. The second largest subgroup of GPCRs, the Adhesion GPCRs, has 33 members in humans. Phylogenetic analysis of the entire repertoire of the seven transmembrane- domain (7TM) regions of GPCRs shows that the Adhesion GPCRs form a distinct family. Adhesion GPCRs are characterised by (1) long N termini with multiple functional domains often found in other proteins such as tyrosine kinases, integrins and cadherins, (2) highly complex genomic structure with multiple introns and splice variants and (3) a 7TM region that has no clear similarities with 7TM from other GPCRs. Several Adhesion GPCRs are known to have a role in the immune system but it is becoming more evident that many have important roles in the CNS. We speculate that the overall structural construction of the Adhesion GPCRs allows them to participate in different types of cell guidance. Received 8 February 2007; received after revision 21 March 2007; accepted 25 April 2007     

Functions of intrinsic disorder in transmembrane proteins

Intrinsic disorder is common in integral membrane proteins, particularly in the intracellular domains. Despite this observation, these domains are not always recognized as being disordered. In this review, we will discuss the biological functions of intrinsically disordered regions of membrane proteins, and address why the flexibility afforded by disorder is mechanistically important. Intrinsically disordered regions are present in many common classes of membrane proteins including ion channels and transporters; G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), receptor tyrosine kinases and cytokine receptors. The functions of the disordered regions are many and varied. We will discuss selected examples including: (1) Organization of receptors, kinases, phosphatases and second messenger sources into signaling complexes. (2) Modulation of the membrane-embedded domain function by ball-and-chain like mechanisms. (3) Trafficking of membrane proteins. (4) Transient membrane associations. (5) Post-translational modifications most notably phosphorylation and (6) disorder-linked isoform dependent function. We finish the review by discussing the future challenges facing the membrane protein community regarding protein disorder.     

Chromatin domain boundaries in the Bithorax complex

Eukaryotic chromosomes are thought to be organized into a series of discrete higher-order chromatin domains. This organization is believed to be important not only in the compaction of the chromatin fibre, but also in the utilization of genetic information. Critical to this model are the domain boundaries that delimit and segregate the chromosomes into units of independent gene activity. In Drosophila, such domain boundaries have been identified through two different approaches. On the one hand, elements like scs/scs′ and the reiterated binding site for the SU(HW) protein have been characterized through their activity of impeding enhancer-promoter interactions when intercalated between them. Their role of chromatin insulators can protect transgenes from genomic position effects, thereby establishing in dependent functional domains within the chromosome. On the other hand, domain boundaries of the Bithorax complex (BX-C) like Fab-7 and Mcp have been identified through mutational analysis. Mcp and Fab-7, however, may represent a specific class of boundary elements; instead of separating adjacent domains that contain separate structural genes, Mcp and Fab-7 delimit adjacent cis-regulatory domains, each of which interacts independently with their target promoters. In this article, we review the genetic and molecular characteristics of the domain boundaries of the BX-C. We describe how Fab-7 functions to confine activating as well as repressive signals to the flanking regulatory domains. Although the mechanisms by which Fab-7 works as a domain boundary remain an open issue, we provide preliminary evidence that Fab-7 is not a mere insulator like scs or the reiterated binding site for the SU(HW) protein.     

Tubulin chaperone E binds microtubules and proteasomes and protects against misfolded protein stress

Mutation of tubulin chaperone E (TBCE) underlies hypoparathyroidism, retardation, and dysmorphism (HRD) syndrome with defective microtubule (MT) cytoskeleton. TBCE/yeast Pac2 comprises CAP-Gly, LRR (leucine-rich region), and UbL (ubiquitin-like) domains. TBCE folds α-tubulin and promotes α/β dimerization. We show that Pac2 functions in MT dynamics: the CAP-Gly domain binds α-tubulin and MTs, and functions in suppression of benomyl sensitivity of pac2Δ mutants. Pac2 binds proteasomes: the LRR binds Rpn1, and the UbL binds Rpn10; the latter interaction mediates Pac2 turnover. The UbL also binds the Skp1-Cdc53-F-box (SCF) ubiquitin ligase complex; these competing interactions for the UbL may impact on MT dynamics. pac2Δ mutants are sensitive to misfolded protein stress. This is suppressed by ectopic PAC2 with both the CAP-Gly and UbL domains being essential. We propose a novel role for Pac2 in the misfolded protein stress response based on its ability to interact with both the MT cytoskeleton and the proteasomes.     

The Vps10p-domain receptor family

The family of mammalian type-I transmembrane receptors containing a Vps10p domain contains five members, Sortilin, SorCS1, SorCS2, SorCS3, and SorLA. The common characteristic of these receptors is an N-terminal Vps10p domain, which either represents the only module of the luminal/extracellular moiety or is combined with additional domains. Family members play roles in protein transport and signal transduction. The individual receptors bind and internalize a variety of ligands, such as neuropeptides and trophic factors, and Sortilin and SorLA mediate trans-Golgi network-to-endosome sorting. Their prominent neuronal expression, several of the identified ligands, and recent results support the notion that members of this receptor family have important functions in neurogenesis, plasticity-related processes, and functional maintenance of the nervous system. For instance, it has been demonstrated that Sortilin partakes in the transduction of proapoptotic effects, and there is converging biochemical and genetic evidence that implies that SorLA is an Alzheimer’s disease risk factor.     

Hormone-induced subcellular redistribution of trimeric G proteins

Trimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) function as the key regulatory elements in a number of transmembrane signaling cascades where they convey information from agonist-activated receptors to effector molecules. The subcellular localization of G proteins is directly related to their functional role, i.e., the dominant portion of the cellular pool of G proteins resides in the plasma membrane. An intimate association of G protein subunits with the plasma membrane has been well known for a long time. However, results of a number of independent studies published in the past decade have indicated clearly that exposure of intact target cells to agonists results in subcellular redistribution of the cognate G proteins from plasma membranes to the light-vesicular membrane fractions, in internalization from the cell surface into the cell interior and in transfer from the membrane to the soluble cell fraction (high-speed supernatant), i.e., solubilization. Solubilization of G protein α subunits as a consequence of stimulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) with agonists has also been observed in isolated membrane preparations. The membrane-cytosol shift of G proteins was detected even after direct activation of these proteins by non-hydrolyzable analogues of GTP or by cholera toxin-induced ADP-ribosylation. In addition, prolonged stimulation of GPCRs with agonists has been shown to lead to down-regulation of the relevant G proteins. Together, these data suggest that G proteins might potentially participate in a highly complex set of events, which are generally termed desensitization of the hormone response. Internalization, subcellular redistribution, solubilization, and down-regulation of trimeric G proteins may thus provide an additional means (i.e., beside receptor-based mechanisms) to dampen the hormone or neurotransmitter response after sustained (long-term) exposure. Received 31 August 2001; received after revision 31 October 2001; accepted 7 November 2001     

Molecular basis of parathyroid hormone receptor signaling and trafficking: a family B GPCR paradigm

The parathyroid hormone (PTH) receptor type 1 (PTHR), a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), transmits signals to two hormone systems—PTH, endocrine and homeostatic, and PTH-related peptide (PTHrP), paracrine—to regulate different biological processes. PTHR responds to these hormonal stimuli by activating heterotrimeric G proteins, such as G_S that stimulates cAMP production. It was thought that the PTHR, as for all other GPCRs, is only active and signals through G proteins on the cell membrane, and internalizes into a cell to be desensitized and eventually degraded or recycled. Recent studies with cultured cell and animal models reveal a new pathway that involves sustained cAMP signaling from intracellular domains. Not only do these studies challenge the paradigm that cAMP production triggered by activated GPCRs originates exclusively at the cell membrane but they also advance a comprehensive model to account for the functional differences between PTH and PTHrP acting through the same receptor.     

Protein folding in membranes

Separation of cells and organelles by bilayer membranes is a fundamental principle of life. Cellular membranes contain a baffling variety of proteins, which fulfil vital functions as receptors and signal transducers, channels and transporters, motors and anchors. The vast majority of membrane-bound proteins contain bundles of α-helical transmembrane domains. Understanding how these proteins adopt their native, biologically active structures in the complex milieu of a membrane is therefore a major challenge in today’s life sciences. Here, we review recent progress in the folding, unfolding and refolding of α-helical membrane proteins and compare the molecular interactions that stabilise proteins in lipid bilayers. We also provide a critical discussion of a detergent denaturation assay that is increasingly used to determine membrane-protein stability but is not devoid of conceptual difficulties.     

P58IPK, a novel cochaperone containing tetratricopeptide repeats and a J-domain with oncogenic potential

Tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) are loosely conserved 34-amino acid sequence motifs that have been shown to function as scaffolding structures to mediate protein-protein interactions. TPRs have been identified in a number of proteins with diverse functions and cellular locations. Recent studies suggest that individual TPR motifs can confer specificity in promoting homotypic and/or heterotypic interactions, often in a mutually exclusive manner. These features are best exemplified by the P58IPK protein, an influenza virus-activated cellular inhibitor of the PKR protein kinase, whose different TPR motifs mediate interactions with distinct proteins. P58IPK, which possesses cochaperone and oncogenic properties, represents a unique class of TPR proteins containing a J-domain. Here we review recent progress on the structural and functional characterization of P58IPK, and discuss the possible mechanisms by which P58IPK modulates PKR and induces tumorigenesis in view of present knowledge of TPR proteins and molecular chaperones.     

Mechanistic principles of RAF kinase signaling

The RAF family of kinases are key components acting downstream of receptor tyrosine kinases and cells employ several distinct mechanisms to strictly control their activity. RAF transitions from an inactive state, where the N-terminal regulatory region binds intramolecularly to the C-terminal kinase domain, to an open state capable of executing the phosphoryl transfer reaction. This transition involves changes both within and between the protein domains in RAF. Many different proteins regulate the transition between inactive and active states of RAF, including RAS and KSR, which are arguably the two most prominent regulators of RAF function. Recent developments have added several new twists to our understanding of RAF regulation. Among others, dimerization of the RAF kinase domain is emerging as a crucial step in the RAF activation process. The multitude of regulatory protein–protein interactions involving RAF remains a largely untapped area for therapeutic applications.     

Heterologous expression of G-protein-coupled receptors: comparison of expression systems from the standpoint of large-scale production and purification

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are of prime importance for cell signal transduction mechanisms and are the target of many current and potential drugs. However, structural data on these membrane proteins is still scarce because of their low natural abundance and the low efficiency of most of the expression systems currently available. This review presents the most important expression systems currently employed for heterologous expression of GPCRs; Escherichia coli, yeast, insect cells and mammalian cells. After briefly recalling the specificity, advantages and limitations of each system, particular emphasis is put on the quantitative comparison of these expression systems in terms of overall expression yield, and on the influence of various factors (primary sequence, origin, cell type, N- and C-terminal tags) on the results.     

Signal regulation by family conspiracy

The signal regulating proteins (SIRPs) are a family of ubiquitously expressed transmembrane glycoproteins composed of two subgroups: SIRPα and SIRPβ, containing more than ten members. SIRPα has been shown to inhibit signalling through a variety of receptors including receptor tyrosine kinases and cytokine receptors. This function involves protein tyrosine kinases and is dependent on immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs which recruit key protein tyrosine phosphatases to the membrane. Negative regulation by SIRPα may also involve its ligand, CD47, in a bi-directional signalling mechanism. The SIRPβ subtype has no cytoplasmic domain but instead associates with at least one other transmembrane protein (DAP-12, or KARAP). DAP-12 possesses immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs within its cytoplasmic domain that are thought to link SIRPβ to activating machinery. SIRPα and SIRPβ thus have complementary roles in signal regulation and may conspire to tune the response to a stimulus. Received 6 July 2000; revised 2 August 2000; accepted 5 August 2000     

Plexin structures are coming: opportunities for multilevel investigations of semaphorin guidance receptors, their cell signaling mechanisms, and functions

Plexin transmembrane receptors and their semaphorin ligands, as well as their co-receptors (Neuropilin, Integrin, VEGFR2, ErbB2, and Met kinase) are emerging as key regulatory proteins in a wide variety of developmental, regenerative, but also pathological processes. The diverse arenas of plexin function are surveyed, including roles in the nervous, cardiovascular, bone and skeletal, and immune systems. Such different settings require considerable specificity among the plexin and semaphorin family members which in turn are accompanied by a variety of cell signaling networks. Underlying the latter are the mechanistic details of the interactions and catalytic events at the molecular level. Very recently, dramatic progress has been made in solving the structures of plexins and of their complexes with associated proteins. This molecular level information is now suggesting detailed mechanisms for the function of both the extracellular as well as the intracellular plexin regions. Specifically, several groups have solved structures for extracellular domains for plexin-A2, -B1, and -C1, many in complex with semaphorin ligands. On the intracellular side, the role of small Rho GTPases has been of particular interest. These directly associate with plexin and stimulate a GTPase activating (GAP) function in the plexin catalytic domain to downregulate Ras GTPases. Structures for the Rho GTPase binding domains have been presented for several plexins, some with Rnd1 bound. The entire intracellular domain structure of plexin-A1, -A3, and -B1 have also been solved alone and in complex with Rac1. However, key aspects of the interplay between GTPases and plexins remain far from clear. The structural information is helping the plexin field to focus on key questions at the protein structural, cellular, as well as organism level that collaboratoria of investigations are likely to answer.     

Mammalian olfactory receptors: pharmacology, G protein coupling and desensitization

The vertebrate olfactory system recognizes and discriminates between thousands of structurally diverse odorants. Detection of odorants in mammals is mediated by olfactory receptors (ORs), which comprise the largest superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Upon odorant binding, ORs couple to G proteins, resulting in an increase in intracellular cAMP levels and subsequent receptor signaling. In this review, we will discuss recently published studies outlining the molecular basis of odor discrimination, focusing on pharmacology, G protein activation, and desensitization of ORs. A greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying OR activity may help in the discovery of agonists and antagonists of ORs, and of GPCRs with potential therapeutic applications.     

Cytoskeleton–membrane interactions in membrane raft structure

Cell membranes are structurally heterogeneous, composed of discrete domains with unique physical and biological properties. Membrane domains can form through a number of mechanisms involving lipid–lipid and protein–lipid interactions. One type of membrane domain is the cholesterol-dependent membrane raft. How rafts form remains a current topic in membrane biology. We review here evidence of structuring of rafts by the cortical actin cytoskeleton. This includes evidence that the actin cytoskeleton associates with rafts, and that many of the structural and functional properties of rafts require an intact actin cytoskeleton. We discuss the mechanisms of the actin-dependent raft organization, and the properties of the actin cytoskeleton in regulating raft-associated signaling events. We end with a discussion of membrane rafts and the actin cytoskeleton in T cell activation, which function synergistically to initiate the adaptive immune response.     

Molecular and structural effects of inverse agonistic mutations on signaling of the thyrotropin receptor – a basally active GPCR

Several mutations that decrease the basal signaling activity of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) with pathogenic implications are known. Here we study the molecular mechanisms responsible for this phenotype and investigate how basal and further activated receptor conformations are interrelated. In the basally active thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) we combined spatially-distant mutations with opposing effects on basal activity in double-mutations and characterized mutant basal and TSH induced signaling. Mutations lowering basal activity always have a suppressive influence on TSH induced signaling and on constitutively activating mutations (CAMs). Our results suggest that the conformation of a basally ‘silenced’ GPCR might impair its intrinsic capacity for signaling compared to the wild-type. Striking differences in conformation and intramolecular interactions between TSHR models built using the crystal structures of inactive rhodopsin and partially active opsin help illuminate the molecular details underlying mutations decreasing basal activity. G. Kleinau, H. Jaeschke: These two authors contributed equally to this work. Received 31 July 2008; received after revision 12 September 2008; accepted 19 September 2008