Crystallin proteins and amyloid fibrils

Improper protein folding (misfolding) can lead to the formation of disordered (amorphous) or ordered (amyloid fibril) aggregates. The major lens protein, α-crystallin, is a member of the small heat-shock protein (sHsp) family of intracellular molecular chaperone proteins that prevent protein aggregation. Whilst the chaperone activity of sHsps against amorphously aggregating proteins has been well studied, its action against fibril-forming proteins has received less attention despite the presence of sHsps in deposits found in fibril-associated diseases (e.g. Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s). In this review, the literature on the interaction of αB-crystallin and other sHsps with fibril-forming proteins is summarized. In particular, the ability of sHsps to prevent fibril formation, their mechanisms of action and the possible in vivo consequences of such associations are discussed. Finally, the fibril-forming propensity of the crystallin proteins and its implications for cataract formation are described along with the potential use of fibrillar crystallin proteins as bionanomaterials. Received 13 June 2008; received after revision 29 July 2008; accepted 05 August 2008     

Chaperone-like features of bovine serum albumin: a comparison with α-crystallin

The chaperone behaviour of bovine serum albumin was compared with that of α-crystallin. The chaperone activity was assessed by measuring: (i) the ability to antagonize protein aggregation induced by heat; (ii) the capability to protect the activity of thermally stressed enzymes and (iii) the effectiveness in assisting the functional recovery of chemically denatured sorbitol dehydrogenase. Despite the lack of structural analogies, both proteins show several functional similarities in preventing inactivation of thermally stressed enzymes and in reactivating chemically denatured sorbitol dehydrogenase. As with α-crystallin, the chaperone action of bovine serum albumin appears to be ATP independent. Bovine serum albumin appears significantly less effective than α-crystallin only in preventing thermally induced protein aggregation. A possible relationship between chaperone function and structural organization is proposed. Together, our results indicate that bovine serum albumin acts as a molecular chaperone and that, for its particular distribution, can be included in the extracellular chaperone family. Received 29 August 2005; received after revision 23 September 2005; accepted 12 October 2005     

SecB,one small chaperone in the complex milieu of the cell

SecB is only one of a plethora of cytosolic chaperones in E. coli whose common property is that they bind nonnative proteins. It plays a crucial role during protein export via the general secretory pathway by modulating the partitioning of precursors between folding or aggregation and delivery to the membrane-bound translocation apparatus. In this latter role SecB demonstrates specific binding to a unique partner, SecA. SecB has the potential to participate in functions outside of export acting as a general nonspecific chaperone to provide buffering capacity of the nonnative state of proteins in the cytosolic pool. We discuss the interactions of SecB with its many binding partners in light of its recently determined structure, emphasizing both kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. RID="*" ID="*"Corresponding author.     

The small heat shock proteins and their clients

Small heat shock proteins are ubiquitous proteins found throughout all kingdoms. One of the most notable features is their large oligomeric structures with conserved structural organization. It is well documented that small heat shock proteins can capture unfolding proteins to form stable complexes and prevent their irreversible aggregation. In addition, small heat shock proteins coaggregate with aggregation-prone proteins for subsequent, efficient disaggregation of the protein aggregates. The release of substrate proteins from the transient reservoirs, i.e. complexes and aggregates with small heat shock proteins, and their refolding require cooperation with ATP-dependent chaperone systems. The amphitropic small heat shock proteins were shown to associate with membranes, although they do not contain transmembrane domains or signal sequences. Recent studies indicate that small heat shock proteins play an important role in membrane quality control and thereby potentially contribute to the maintenance of membrane integrity especially under stress conditions. Received 11 July 2006; received after revision 4 October 2006; accepted 10 November 2006     

Heat-shock protein 90, a chaperone for folding and regulation

Heat-shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is an abundant and highly conserved molecular chaperone that is essential for viability in eukaryotes. Hsp90 fulfills a housekeeping function in contributing to the folding, maintenance of structural integrity and proper regulation of a subset of cytosolic proteins. A remarkable proportion of its substrates are proteins involved in cell cycle control and signal transduction. Hsp90 acts with a cohort of Hsp90 co-chaperones that modulate its substrate recognition, ATPase cycle and chaperone function. The large conformational flexibility of Hsp90 and a multitude of dynamic co-chaperone complexes contribute to generating functional diversity, and allow Hsp90 to assist a wide range of substrates.     

Faithful chaperones

This review describes the properties of some rare eukaryotic chaperones that each assist in the folding of only one target protein. In particular, we describe (1) the tubulin cofactors, (2) p47, which assists in the folding of collagen, (3) α-hemoglobin stabilizing protein (AHSP), (4) the adenovirus L4-100 K protein, which is a chaperone of the major structural viral protein, hexon, and (5) HYPK, the huntingtin-interacting protein. These various-sized proteins (102–1,190 amino acids long) are all involved in the folding of oligomeric polypeptides but are otherwise functionally unique, as they each assist only one particular client. This raises a question regarding the biosynthetic cost of the high-level production of such chaperones. As the clients of faithful chaperones are all abundant proteins that are essential cellular or viral components, it is conceivable that this necessary metabolic expenditure withstood evolutionary pressure to minimize biosynthetic costs. Nevertheless, the complexity of the folding pathways in which these chaperones are involved results in error-prone processes. Several human disorders associated with these chaperones are discussed.     

Protein folding and degradation in bacteria: to degrade or not to degrade? That is the question

In Escherichia coli protein quality control is carried out by a protein network, comprising chaperones and proteases. Central to this network are two protein families, the AAA+ and the Hsp70 family. The major Hsp70 chaperone, DnaK, efficiently prevents protein aggregation and supports the refolding of damaged proteins. In a special case, DnaK, together with the assistance of the AAA+ protein ClpB, can also refold aggregated proteins. Other Hsp70 systems have more specialized functions in the cell, for instance HscA appears to be involved in the assembly of Fe/S proteins. In contrast to ClpB, many AAA+ proteins associate with a peptidase to form proteolytic machines which remove irreversibly damaged proteins from the cellular pool. The AAA+ component of these proteolytic machines drives protein degradation. They are required not only for recognition of the substrate but also for substrate unfolding and translocation into the proteolytic chamber. In many cases, specific adaptor proteins modify the substrate binding properties of AAA+ proteins. While chaperones and proteases do not appear to directly cooperate with each other, both systems appear to be necessary for proper functioning of the cell and can, at least in part, substitute for one another. RID="*" ID="*"Corresponding author.     

The effect of αB-crystallin and Hsp27 on the availability of translation initiation factors in heat-shocked cells

The mechanism of the translational thermotolerance provided by the small heat shock proteins (sHsps) αB-crystallin or Hsp27 is unknown. We show here that Hsp27, but not αB-crystallin, increased the pool of mobile stress granule-associated enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP)-eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF)4E in heat-shocked cells, as determined by fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. Hsp27 also partially prevented the sharp decrease in the pool of mobile cytoplasmic EGFP-eIF4G. sHsps did not prevent the phosphorylation of eIF2α by a heat shock, but promoted dephosphorylation during recovery. Expression of the C-terminal fragment of GADD34, which causes constitutive dephosphorylation of eIF2α, fully compensated for the stimulatory effect of αB-crystallin on protein synthesis in heat-shocked cells, but only partially for that of Hsp27. Our data show that sHsps do not prevent the inhibition of protein synthesis upon heat shock, but restore translation more rapidly by promoting the dephosphorylation of eIF2α and, in the case of Hsp27, the availability of eIF4E and eIF4G. Received 9 December 2005; received after revision 16 January 2006; accepted 23 January 2006     

The bacterial translocase: a dynamic protein channel complex

The major route of protein translocation in bacteria is the so-called general secretion pathway (Sec-pathway). This route has been extensively studied in Escherichia coli and other bacteria. The movement of preproteins across the cytoplasmic membrane is mediated by a multimeric membrane protein complex called translocase. The core of the translocase consists of a proteinaceous channel formed by an oligomeric assembly of the heterotrimeric membrane protein complex SecYEG and the peripheral adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) SecA as molecular motor. Many secretory proteins utilize the molecular chaperone SecB for targeting and stabilization of the unfolded state prior to translocation, while most nascent inner membrane proteins are targeted to the translocase by the signal recognition particle and its membrane receptor. Translocation is driven by ATP hydrolysis and the proton motive force. In the last decade, genetic and biochemical studies have provided detailed insights into the mechanism of preprotein translocation. Recent crystallographic studies on SecA, SecB and the SecYEG complex now provide knowledge about the structural features of the translocation process. Here, we will discuss the mechanistic and structural basis of the translocation of proteins across and the integration of membrane proteins into the cytoplasmic membrane.Received 10 January 2003; received after revision 2 April 2003; accepted 4 April 2003     

G proteins as drug targets

The structure and function of heterotrimeric G protein subunits is known in considerable detail. Upon stimulation of a heptahelical receptor by the appropriate agonists, the cognate G proteins undergo a cycle of activation and deactivation; the α-subunits and the βγ-dimers interact sequentially with several reaction partners (receptor, guanine nucleotides and effectors as well as regulatory proteins) by exposing appropriate binding sites. For most of these domains, low molecular weight ligands have been identified that either activate or inhibit signal transduction. These ligands include short peptides derived from receptors, G protein subunits and effectors, mastoparan and related insect venoms, modified guanine nucleotides, suramin analogues and amphiphilic cations. Because compounds that act on G proteins may be endowed with new forms of selectivity, we propose that G protein subunits may therefore be considered as potential drug targets. Received 18 September 1998; received after revision 6 November 1998; accepted 11 November 1998     

A molecular pin to study the dynamics of β-barrel formation in pore-forming toxins on erythrocytes: a sliding model

γ-Hemolysins are pore-forming toxins which develop from water-soluble monomers by combining two different ‘albeit homologous’ proteins. They form oligomeric pores in both cell and model membranes by undergoing a still poorly understood conformational rearrangement in the stem region. The stem is formed by three β-strands, folded onto the core of the soluble protein and completely extended in the pore. We propose a new model to explain such a process. Seven double-cysteine mutants were developed by inserting one cysteine on the stretch that links the β-hairpin to the core of the protein and another on different positions along the β-strands. The membrane bound protein was blocked in a non-lytic state by S–S bond formation. Six mutants were oxidized as inactive intermediates, but became active after adding DTT. These results demonstrate that the stem extension can be temporarily frozen and that the β-barrel formation occurs by β-strand concerted step-by-step sliding. Received 22 October 2007; received after revision 15 November 2007; accepted 19 November 2007     

Hsp70 chaperones: Cellular functions and molecular mechanism

Hsp70 proteins are central components of the cellular network of molecular chaperones and folding catalysts. They assist a large variety of protein folding processes in the cell by transient association of their substrate binding domain with short hydrophobic peptide segments within their substrate proteins. The substrate binding and release cycle is driven by the switching of Hsp70 between the low-affinity ATP bound state and the high-affinity ADP bound state. Thus, ATP binding and hydrolysis are essential in vitro and in vivo for the chaperone activity of Hsp70 proteins. This ATPase cycle is controlled by co-chaperones of the family of J-domain proteins, which target Hsp70s to their substrates, and by nucleotide exchange factors, which determine the lifetime of the Hsp70-substrate complex. Additional co-chaperones fine-tune this chaperone cycle. For specific tasks the Hsp70 cycle is coupled to the action of other chaperones, such as Hsp90 and Hsp100.Received 21 October 2004; received after revision 24 November 2004; accepted 6 December 2004     

Architecture and regulation of HtrA-family proteins involved in protein quality control and stress response

Protein quality control is vital for all living cells and sophisticated molecular mechanisms have evolved to prevent the excessive accumulation of unfolded proteins. High-temperature requirement A (HtrA) proteases have been identified as important ATP-independent quality-control factors in most species. HtrA proteins harbor a serine-protease domain and at least one peptide-binding PDZ domain to ensure efficient removal of misfolded or damaged proteins. One distinctive property of HtrAs is their ability to assemble into complex oligomers. Whereas all examined HtrAs are capable of forming pyramidal 3-mers, higher-order complexes consisting of up to 24 molecules have been reported. Tight control of chaperone and protease function is of pivotal importance in preventing deleterious HtrA-protease activity. In recent years, structural biology provided detailed insights into the molecular basis of the regulatory mechanisms, which include unique intramolecular allosteric signaling cascades and the dynamic switching of oligomeric states of HtrA proteins. Based on these results, functional models for many family members have been developed. The HtrA protein family represents a remarkable example of how structural and functional diversity is attained from the assembly of simple molecular building blocks.     

Molecular guardians for newborn proteins: ribosome-associated chaperones and their role in protein folding

A central dogma in biology is the conversion of genetic information into active proteins. The biosynthesis of proteins by ribosomes and the subsequent folding of newly made proteins represent the last crucial steps in this process. To guarantee the correct folding of newly made proteins, a complex chaperone network is required in all cells. In concert with ongoing protein biosynthesis, ribosome-associated factors can interact directly with emerging nascent polypeptides to protect them from degradation or aggregation, to promote folding into their native structure, or to otherwise contribute to their folding program. Eukaryotic cells possess two major ribosome-associated systems, an Hsp70/Hsp40-based chaperone system and the functionally enigmatic NAC complex, whereas prokaryotes employ the Trigger Factor chaperone. Recent structural insights into Trigger Factor reveal an intricate cradle-like structure that, together with the exit site of the ribosome, forms a protected environment for the folding of newly synthesized proteins. Received 29 June 2005; received after revision 4 August 2005; accepted 18 August 2005     

Immunophilins: for the love of proteins

Immunophilins are chaperones that may also exhibit peptidylprolyl isomerase (PPIase) activity. This review summarizes our knowledge of the two largest families of immunophilins, namely cyclophilin and FK506-binding protein, and a novel chimeric dual-family immunophilin, named FK506- and cyclosporin-binding protein (FCBP). The larger members of each family are modular in nature, consisting of multiple PPIase and/or protein-protein interaction domains. Despite the apparent difference in their sequence and three-dimensional structure, the three families encode similar enzymatic and biological functions. Recent studies have revealed that many immunophilins possess a chaperone function independent of PPIase activity. Knockout animal studies have confirmed multiple essential roles of immunophilins in physiology and development. An immunophilin is indeed a natural ‘protein-philin’ (Greek ‘philin’ = friend) that interacts with proteins to guide their proper folding and assembly. Received: 7 May 2006; received after revision 3 July 2006; accepted 24 August 2006     

Structure and function of the GroE chaperone

The Escherichia coli proteins GroEL and GroES were the first chaperones to be studied in detail and have thus become a role model for assisted protein folding in general. A wealth of both structural and functional data on the GroE system has been accumulated over the past years, enabling us now to understand the basic principles of how this fascinating protein-folding machine accomplishes its task. According to the current model, GroE processes a nonnative polypeptide in a cycle consisting of three steps. First, the polypeptide substrate is captured by GroEL. Upon binding of the co-chaperone GroES and ATP, the substrate is then discharged into a unique microenvironment inside of the chaperone, which promotes productive folding. After hydrolysis of ATP, the polypeptide is released into solution. Moreover, GroE may actively increase the folding efficiency, e.g. by unfolding of misfolded protein molecules. The mechanisms underlying these features, however, are yet not well characterized.     

Scavenger, transducer, RNA chaperone? What ligands of the prion protein teach us about its function

Prion protein, a misfolded isoform of which is the essential component of the agent of prion diseases, still remains an enigmatic protein whose physiological functions are at best hypothetical. To gain a better insight into its putative role, many studies were undertaken to look for molecules that bind prion protein, and have notably identified divalent metal ions, several proteins, and nucleic acids. At first sight, the diversity of prion protein’s ligands seems of little help to infer a plausible function. However, the intrinsically disordered property of its N-terminal tail and the potential of the protein to adopt a transmembrane topology, can both be taken into account to predict its different states during its cellular cycle and its possible functions, of which the most promising correspond to a general scavenger, a sensor or adaptor in a signaling cascade, and an RNA chaperone. Received 16 August 2006; received after revision 7 November 2006; accepted 13 December 2006     

Life behind cell walls: paradigm lost, paradigm regained

This review of the living cell wall [1] and its protein components is in two parts. The first is anecdotal. A personal account spanning over 40 years research may perhaps be an antidote to one stereotypical view of scientists as detached and humorless. The second part deals with the meaning of function, particularly as it applies to hydroxyproline-rich glycoproteins. Function is a difficult word to define objectively. However, with help from such luminaries as Humpty Dumpty: "A word means what I want it to mean, neither more nor less," and Wittgenstein: "Giving examples of usage ... is the only way to talk about meaning," it is possible to construct a ziggurat representing increasingly complex levels of organization from molecular structure to ecology. Forty years ago I suggested that hydroxyproline-rich structural proteins played a key role in cell wall functioning. But because the bulk of the wall is carbohydrate, there has been an understandable resistance to paradigm change. Expansins, paradoxically, contribute greatly to this resistance because their modus operandi as cell-wall-loosening proteins is based on the idea that they break hydrogen bonds between polysaccharide chains allowing slippage. However, this view is not consistent with the recent discovery [Grobe et al. (1999) Eur. J. Biochem 263: 33-40] that β-expansins may be proteases, as it implies that the extensin network is not a straightjacket but a substrate for expansin in muro. Such a direct role for extensins in both negative and positive regulation of cell expansion and elongation may constitute a major morphogenetic mechanism operating at all levels of plant growth and development.     

Biological activity and pathological implications of misfolded proteins

The physiological metabolism of proteins guarantees that different cellular compartments contain the appropriate concentration of proteins to perform their biological functions and, after a variable period of wear and tear, mediates their natural catabolism. The equilibrium between protein synthesis and catabolism ensures an effective turnover, but hereditary or acquired abnormalities of protein structure can provoke a premature loss of biological function, an accelerated catabolism and diseases caused by the loss of an irreplaceable function. In certain proteins, abnormal structure and metabolism are associated with a strong tendency to self-aggregation into a polymeric fibrillar structure, and in these cases the disease is not principally caused by the loss of an irreplaceable function but by the action of this new biological entity. Amyloid fibrils are an apparently inert, insoluble, mainly extracellular protein polymer that kills the cell without tissue necrosis but by activation of the apoptotic mechanism. We analyzed the data reported so far on the structural and functional properties of four prototypic proteins with well-known biological functions (lysozyme, transthyretin, β2-microglobulin and apolipoprotein AI) that are able to create amyloid fibrils under certain conditions, with the perspective of evaluating whether the achievement of biological function favors or inhibits the process of fibril formation. Furthermore, studying the biological functions carried out by amyloid fibrils reveals new types of protein-protein interactions in the transmission of messages to cells and may provide new ideas for effective therapeutic strategies. Received 9 November 1998; received after revision 15 January 1999; accepted 15 January 1999     

The Janus kinase family of protein tyrosine kinases and their role in signaling

In the early 1990s, the search for protein kinases led to the discovery of a novel family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases, the Janus kinases or JAKs. These proteins were unusual because they contained two kinase homology domains and no other known signaling modules. It soon became clear that these were not ‘just another’ type of kinase. Their ability to complement mutant cells insensitive to interferons and to be activated by a variety of cytokines demonstrated their central signaling function. Now, as we approach the end of the decade, it is evident from biochemical studies to knockout mice that JAKs play non-redundant functions in development, differentiation, and host defense mechanisms. Here, recent progress is reviewed, with particular emphasis on structure-function studies aimed at revealing how this family of tyrosine kinases is regulated.