共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 8 毫秒
1.
2.
Jacques Dutka 《Archive for History of Exact Sciences》1995,49(2):105-134
Communicated by
Curtis Wilson 相似文献
3.
Oscar Sheynin 《Archive for History of Exact Sciences》1993,46(1):39-54
Communicated by C. Truesdell 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Marcus Brazil Ronald L. Graham Doreen A. Thomas Martin Zachariasen 《Archive for History of Exact Sciences》2014,68(3):327-354
The history of the Euclidean Steiner tree problem, which is the problem of constructing a shortest possible network interconnecting a set of given points in the Euclidean plane, goes back to Gergonne in the early nineteenth century. We present a detailed account of the mathematical contributions of some of the earliest papers on the Euclidean Steiner tree problem. Furthermore, we link these initial contributions with results from the recent literature on the problem. 相似文献
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Jacques Dutka 《Archive for History of Exact Sciences》1991,43(3):225-249
Communicated by U. Bottazzini 相似文献
16.
17.
18.
19.
John R. Millburn 《Annals of science》2013,70(6):511-528
Relations between J. A. C. Chaptal, pioneer of heavy chemical industry in France, and A. L. Lavoisier, reformer of chemical theory, are examined in the light of unpublished correspondence they exchanged in the period 1784–1790. The letters, together with Chaptal's early publications, allow a reconstruction of his conversion to Lavoisier's antiphlogistic chemistry. They also reveal a series of petitions that Chaptal made to Lavoisier, in the latter's official capacity as a director of the Régie des poudres et salpêtres, for relief from the controlled price of saltpetre for his acid works in Languedoc. Finally, the relationship is explored as a window on the interplay between chemical theory and industrial practice during the period of the Industrial Revolution. 相似文献
20.
J.A. Chaldecott M.Sc. A.Inst.P. 《Annals of science》2013,70(3):195-201
In the late 1810s and 1820s the Edinburgh phrenologists were largely concerned with trying to establish phrenology as the true science of mind. They challenged the accepted theories about the nature of mind and the brain; in turn, phrenology was attacked by the proponents of Scottish common-sense philosophy and by some medical men. The ensuing debate, which is discussed as an example of conflict between incommensurable world-views, involved a wide range of contentious theological, philosophical, scientific and methodological issues. 相似文献