Selection and estimation of component models for seasonal time series

We present a method for investigating the evolution of trend and seasonality in an observed time series. A general model is fitted to a residual spectrum, using components to represent the seasonality. We show graphically how well the fitted spectrum captures the evidence for evolving seasonality associated with the different seasonal frequencies. We apply the method to model two time series and illustrate the resulting forecasts and seasonal adjustment for one series. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Linear signal extraction with intervention techniques in non-linear time series

Seasonal adjustment is performed in some data-producing agencies according to the ARIMA-model-based signal extraction theory. A stochastic linear process parametrized in terms of an ARIMA model is first fitted to the series, and from this model the models for the trend, cycle, seasonal, and irregular component can be derived. A spectrum is associated to every component model and is used to compute the optimal Wiener–Kolmogorov filter. Since the modelling is linear, prior linearization of the series with intervention techniques is performed. This paper discusses the performance of linear signal extraction with intervention techniques in non-linear processes. In particular, the following issues are discussed: (1) the ability of intervention techniques to linearize time series which present non-linearities; (2) the stability of the linear projection giving the components estimators under non-linear misspecifications; (3) the capacity of the WK filter to preserve the linearity in some components and the non-linearities in others. Copyright © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Unobserved components in ARCH models: An application to seasonal adjustment

The paper deals with unobserved components in ARIMA models with GARCH errors, in the context of an actual application, namely seasonal adjustment of the monthly Spanish money supply series. The series shows clear evidence of (moderate) non-linearity, which does not disappear with simple outlier correction. The GARCH structure explains reasonably well the non-linearity, and this explanation is robust with respect to the GARCH specification. We look at the time variation of the standard error of the adjusted series estimator and show how it can be measured. Next, we look at the implications this variation has on short-term monetary control. The non-linearity seems to have a small effect in practice. It is further seen that the conditional variance of the GARCH process may, in turn, be decomposed into components. In fact, the conditional variance of the money supply series is the sum of a weak linear trend, a strong non-linear seasonal component, and a moderate non-linear irregular component. This information has policy implications: for example, there are periods in the year when policy can be more assertive because information is more precise. Finally, looking at the non-linear components of the money supply it is seen how linear combinations of non-linear series can produce series that behave linearly.     

Single‐season heteroscedasticity in time series

We consider seasonal time series in which one season has variance that is different from all the others. This behaviour is evident in indices of production where variability is highest for the month with the lowest level of production. We show that when one season has different variability from others there are constraints on the seasonal models that can be used; neither dummy and trigonometric models are effective in modelling this type of behaviour. We define a general model that provides an appropriate representation of single‐season heteroscedasticity and suggest a likelihood ratio test for the presence of periodic variance in one season. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Prediction‐based adaptive compositional model for seasonal time series analysis

In this paper we propose a new class of seasonal time series models, based on a stable seasonal composition assumption. With the objective of forecasting the sum of the next ? observations, the concept of rolling season is adopted and a structure of rolling conditional distributions is formulated. The probabilistic properties, estimation and prediction procedures, and the forecasting performance of the model are studied and demonstrated with simulations and real examples.     

The impact of seasonal constants on forecasting seasonally cointegrated time series

In this paper we focus on the effect of (i) deleting, (ii) restricting or (iii) not restricting seasonal intercept terms on forecasting sets of seasonally cointegrated macroeconomic time series for Austria, Germany and the UK. A first empirical result is that the number of cointegrating vectors as well as the relevant estimated parameter values vary across the three models. A second result is that the quality of out-of-sample forecasts critically depends on the way seasonal constants are treated. In most cases, predictive performance can be improved by restricting the effects of seasonal constants. However, we find that the relative advantages and disadvantages of each of the three methods vary across the data sets and may depend on sample-specific features. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The decomposition of forecast in seasonal arima models

This paper presents a procedure to break down the forecast function of a seasonal ARIMA model in terms of its permanent and transitory components. Both depend on the initial values at the forecast origin, but their structures are fixed and independent of this origin. The permanent component is an estimate of the long-run projection of the corresponding economic variable and the transitory element describes the approach towards the permanent one. Within the permanent component a distinction is made between the factors that depend on the initial conditions of the system and those that are deterministic. The procedure is compared to other methods presented in the literature and illustrated in an example.     

Modelling time series with season‐dependent autocorrelation structure

Time series with season‐dependent autocorrelation structure are commonly modelled using periodic autoregressive moving average (PARMA) processes. In most applications, the moving average terms are excluded for ease of estimation. We propose a new class of periodic unobserved component models (PUCM). Parameter estimates for PUCM are readily interpreted; the estimated coefficients correspond to variances of the measurement noise and of the error terms in unobserved components. We show that PUCM have correlation structure equivalent to that of a periodic integrated moving average (PIMA) process. Results from practical applications indicate that our models provide a natural framework for series with periodic autocorrelation structure both in terms of interpretability and forecasting accuracy. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Estimation procedures for structural time series models

A univariate structural time series model based on the traditional decomposition into trend, seasonal and irregular components is defined. A number of methods of computing maximum likelihood estimators are then considered. These include direct maximization of various time domain likelihood function. The asymptotic properties of the estimators are given and a comparison between the various methods in terms of computational efficiency and accuracy is made. The methods are then extended to models with explanatory variables.     

A forecasting procedure for nonlinear autoregressive time series models

Forecasting for nonlinear time series is an important topic in time series analysis. Existing numerical algorithms for multi‐step‐ahead forecasting ignore accuracy checking, alternative Monte Carlo methods are also computationally very demanding and their accuracy is difficult to control too. In this paper a numerical forecasting procedure for nonlinear autoregressive time series models is proposed. The forecasting procedure can be used to obtain approximate m‐step‐ahead predictive probability density functions, predictive distribution functions, predictive mean and variance, etc. for a range of nonlinear autoregressive time series models. Examples in the paper show that the forecasting procedure works very well both in terms of the accuracy of the results and in the ability to deal with different nonlinear autoregressive time series models. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Tourism in the Canary Islands: forecasting using several seasonal time series models

This paper deals with the analysis of the number of tourists travelling to the Canary Islands by means of using different seasonal statistical models. Deterministic and stochastic seasonality is considered. For the latter case, we employ seasonal unit roots and seasonally fractionally integrated models. As a final approach, we also employ a model with possibly different orders of integration at zero and the seasonal frequencies. All these models are compared in terms of their forecasting ability in an out‐of‐sample experiment. The results in the paper show that a simple deterministic model with seasonal dummy variables and AR(1) disturbances produce better results than other approaches based on seasonal fractional and integer differentiation over short horizons. However, increasing the time horizon, the results cannot distinguish between the model based on seasonal dummies and another using fractional integration at zero and the seasonal frequencies. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Real time prediction of irregular periodic time series data

By means of a novel time-dependent cumulated variation penalty function, a new class of real-time prediction methods is developed to improve the prediction accuracy of time series exhibiting irregular periodic patterns: in particular, the breathing motion data of the patients during robotic radiation therapy. It is illustrated that for both simulated and empirical data involving changes in mean, trend, and amplitude, the proposed methods outperform existing forecasting methods based on support vector machines and artificial neural network in terms of prediction accuracy. Moreover, the proposed methods are designed so that real-time updates can be done efficiently with O(1) computational complexity upon the arrival of a new signal without scanning the old data repeatedly.     

Seasonal prediction of European cereal prices: good forecasts using bad models?

Because of their natural adherence to the climate and pronounced seasonal cycles, prices of field crops constitute an interesting field for exploring seasonal time series models. We consider quarterly prices of two major cereals: barley and wheat. Using traditional in‐sample fit and moving‐window techniques, we investigate whether seasonality is deterministic or unit‐root stochastic and whether seasonal cycles have converged over time. We find that seasonal cycles in the data are mainly deterministic and that evidence on common cycles across countries differs for the two commodities. Out‐of‐sample prediction experiments, however, yield a ranking with respect to accuracy that does not match the statistical in‐sample evidence. Parametric bootstrap experiments establish that the observed mismatch is indeed an inherent and systematic feature. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

ARARMA models for time series analysis and forecasting

Methods of time series forecasting are proposed which can be applied automatically. However, they are not rote formulae, since they are based on a flexible philosophy which can provide several models for consideration. In addition it provides diverse diagnostics for qualitatively and quantitatively estimating how well one can forecast a series. The models considered are called ARARMA models (or ARAR models) because the model fitted to a long memory time series (t) is based on sophisticated time series analysis of AR (or ARMA) schemes (short memory models) fitted to residuals Y(t) obtained by parsimonious‘best lag’non-stationary autoregression. Both long range and short range forecasts are provided by an ARARMA model Section 1 explains the philosophy of our approach to time series model identification. Sections 2 and 3 attempt to relate our approach to some standard approaches to forecasting; exponential smoothing methods are developed from the point of view of prediction theory (section 2) and extended (section 3). ARARMA models are introduced (section 4). Methods of ARARMA model fitting are outlined (sections 5,6). Since‘the proof of the pudding is in the eating’, the methods proposed are illustrated (section 7) using the classic example of international airline passengers.     

On multistep prediction error methods for time series models

Multistep prediction error methods for linear time series models are considered from both a theoretical and a practical standpoint. The emphasis is on autoregressive moving-average (ARMA) models for which a multistep prediction error estimation method (PEM) is developed. The results of a Monte Carlo simulation study aimed at establishing the possible merits of the multistep PEM are presented.     

Diagnostic checks of non-standard time series models

Diagnostic checks have become a standard tool for helping to assess the adequacy of a forecasting system since Box and Jenkins' (1970) ARIMA modelling technique became popular. However, most of the research has developed checks for normal or second-order stationary models. This paper gives various diagnostic checks that can be performed simply on nonnormal, non-standard models such as the class of multiprocess models (Harrison and Stevens, 1976), where residuals are definitely not normal. The performance to date of these models can then be objectively scrutinized on-line. Examples, including a generalized cusum technique, are given to illustrate the effectiveness of the techniques on specific series.     

Subset selection of autoregressive time series models

We propose a solution to select promising subsets of autoregressive time series models for further consideration which follows up on the idea of the stochastic search variable selection procedure in George and McCulloch (1993). It is based on a Bayesian approach which is unconditional on the initial terms. The autoregression stepup is in the form of a hierarchical normal mixture model, where latent variables are used to identify the subset choice. The framework of our procedure is utilized by the Gibbs sampler, a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. The advantage of the method presented is computational: it is an alternative way to search over a potentially large set of possible subsets. The proposed method is illustrated with a simulated data as well as a real data. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Highest-density forecast regions for nonlinear and non-normal time series models

Forecast regions are a common way to summarize forecast accuracy. They usually consist of an interval symmetric about the forecast mean. However, symmetric intervals may not be appropriate forecast regions when the forecast density is not symmetric and unimodal. With many modern time series models, such as those which are non-linear or have non-normal errors, the forecast densities are often asymmetric or multimodal. The problem of obtaining forecast regions in such cases is considered and it is proposed that highest-density forecast regions be used. A graphical method for presenting the results is discussed.     

A non‐linear dynamic model for multiplicative seasonal‐trend decomposition

A non‐linear dynamic model is introduced for multiplicative seasonal time series that follows and extends the X‐11 paradigm where the observed time series is a product of trend, seasonal and irregular factors. A selection of standard seasonal and trend component models used in additive dynamic time series models are adapted for the multiplicative framework and a non‐linear filtering procedure is proposed. The results are illustrated and compared to X‐11 and log‐additive models using real data. In particular it is shown that the new procedures do not suffer from the trend bias present in log‐additive models. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.