Spinoza: Philosophy as I remember it

Spinoza: Philosophy as I remember it     

系统哲学是马克思主义哲学的全新发展

本文探讨系统哲学对传统马克思主义哲学做了哪些重要发展。文中认为传统马克思主义哲学对物质世界发展、演化一般规律的认识,实际上只是系统哲学所给出的普遍规律的部分特殊情况,在关键问题上忽视了问题的普遍性和复杂性。本文根据系统哲学原理试图再次证实：事物发展演化的动力并非依赖于矛盾的同一性和斗争性,以及事物发展演化的方式与途径是非常复杂的,一般是非线性的,而不只是质量互变和否定之否定这样单纯的简单过程。从而说明,系统哲学是马克思主义哲学的全新发展。     

Schools as Communities: Purveyors of Democratic Values and the Cornerstones of a Public Philosophy

Establishing interdependency and community among people may be the solution to reestablishing or creating a tighter fabric of support for childrens' development, for building cultural democracy and a democratic state. This paper attempts to create a bridge between education and the construction of sustainable democratic communities in education, as a basis for building a public philosophy. Ultimately, sustainable democratic educational communities may address the concerns of today and tomorrow and build sustainable democratic communities in the larger global society.     

后现代哲学的挑战与系统哲学的回应

后现代哲学源于从工业时代到信息时代观念断层的困惑 ,其挑战所指从机械论延伸到作为几百年来科学技术赖以为基础的思维方法。系统科学中的哲学思想 ,它批判地继承传统科学思维方式的合理内容 ,承认复杂性与简单性的相互沟通和可相互归约性 ,以综合传统与未来的思维方式回应着后现代哲学的挑战。作者近年来围绕上述问题所做的创新性工作主要有 :信息进化论和宇宙大循环论 ,信息生命观和社会协同论。     

同一时代的两种哲学思潮——试论系统哲学与后现代哲学的异同

系统哲学与后现代哲学都是西方学者提出的概念,它们是同一时代的两种哲学思潮。一些系统哲学家和后现代哲学家都从不同的角度互相提及,那么,系统哲学与后现代哲学到底有什么关系,本文试图简要分析这一问题。     

Am i using a systems approach?

Collaboration and cooperation within the systems community require a facility to aid recognition and appreciation of how individual contributions fit into the totality of systems practice. A framework to help in this is suggested, linked to characteristic concepts and techniques of three identified generations of systems approaches-two derived from a management-linked systems practice in the 1970s and late 1980s, the third from new attempts to design a better future.     

Science as Systemic Intervention: Some Implications of Systems Thinking and Complexity for the Philosophy of Science

This paper sidesteps the usual starting points for debate about complexity and the philosophy of science, which tend to assume that science is primarily about observation. Instead, the starting point is intervention, defined as purposeful action by an agent to create change. While some authors suggest that intervention and observation are opposites, it is argued here that observation (as undertaken in science) should be viewed as just one type of intervention. We should therefore welcome scientific techniques of observation into a pluralistic set of intervention methods, alongside methods for exploring values, reflecting on subjective understandings, planning future activities, etc. However, there is a need to explicitly counter a possible pernicious interpretation of this argument: intervention could (erroneously) be viewed as flawlessly preplanned change based on accurate predictions of the consequences of action. This is the mechanistic worldview that systems thinking and complexity science seek to challenge. Therefore, having redefined scientific observation as intervention, the paper revisits insights from systems thinking and complexity to propose a methodology of systemic intervention. Some brief reflections are then provided on the wider social implications of this methodology.     

企业资金运动系统的哲学观

从马克思主义哲学的角度,从七个方面对企业资金运动系统作了一般性描述,并探讨了企业资金运动的五个基本特性,最后给出了企业资金运动系统的最优整体结合效果表达式。     

系统哲学与整体性思维方式

整体性是系统哲学的基本特点。从系统本体论、系统认识论、系统价值论三个方面对系统哲学的整体性作了论述。作为综合时代的综合哲学，系统哲学必然影响到人们的世界观与思维方式，它将在人类现代社会生产与生活中得到广泛的实践与应用，其优越性将得到体现。