Defending the genome from the enemy within: mechanisms of retrotransposon suppression in the mouse germline

The viability of any species requires that the genome is kept stable as it is transmitted from generation to generation by the germ cells. One of the challenges to transgenerational genome stability is the potential mutagenic activity of transposable genetic elements, particularly retrotransposons. There are many different types of retrotransposon in mammalian genomes, and these target different points in germline development to amplify and integrate into new genomic locations. Germ cells, and their pluripotent developmental precursors, have evolved a variety of genome defence mechanisms that suppress retrotransposon activity and maintain genome stability across the generations. Here, we review recent advances in understanding how retrotransposon activity is suppressed in the mammalian germline, how genes involved in germline genome defence mechanisms are regulated, and the consequences of mutating these genome defence genes for the developing germline.     

DNA methylation of fly genes and transposons

The use of anti-5-methylcytosine antibodies in affinity columns allowed the identification of methylated sequences in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster adults. In view of the presence of transposable elements amongst the identified sequences, it has been suggested that DNA methylation is involved in transposon control in the fly genome. On the contrary, a reanalysis of these data furnishes several intriguing elements that could raise new questions about the role that DNA methylation plays in the fly genome. The aim of the present paper is to discuss some features that emerge from the analysis of the identified methylated sequences. Received 26 January 2006; received after revision 8 May 2006; accepted 2 June 2006     

DNA damage repair and transcription

Silencing of DNA repair genes plays a critical role in the development of the cancer because these genes, functioning normally, would prevent the accumulation of mutations leading to carcinogenesis. Epigenetic gene silencing is an alternative mechanism to genetic gene aberration, inactivating those genes in cancer. DNA methylation and histone modification are the major factors for epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Here, we describe recent advances in understanding of epigenetic silencing of DNA repair genes and their epigenetic mechanisms involving DNA methylation and histone modification.     

si—DNMT1对肝门部胆管癌细胞抑癌基因甲基化的作用

目的研究RNA干扰对肝门部胆管癌细胞株QRC939抑癌基因甲基化的影响,初步探谤其在胆管癌治疗中的价值。方法构建靶向hDNMT1的发夹式siRNA表达载体;运用脂质体介导法将其转染人胆管癌细胞QBC939;RT-PCR法检测不同时间点hDNMT1、CDH1、p15的表达水平;MSP方法检测转染前后抑癌基因CDH1、p15的甲基纯状态;MTT检测各组细胞的增殖能力。结果1）hDNMT1的基因沉默恢复了抑癌基因CDH1、p15的表达水平;2）CDH1、p15的表达沉默是由启动子高甲基亿导致的;3）转染靶向hDNMT1的发夹式siRNA表达载体能有效地抑制QBC939的增殖能力。结论靶向hDNMT1的发夹式siRNA表达载体能有效、持续、稳定发挥对hDNMT1的基因沉默作用,恢复抑癌基因CDH1、p15的表达水平,从而抑制QBC939肿瘤细胞增殖。     

Emerging connections between DNA methylation and histone acetylation

Modifications of both DNA and chromatin can affect gene expression and lead to gene silencing. Evidence of links between DNA methylation and histone hypoacetylation is accumulating. Several proteins that specifically bind to methylated DNA are associated with complexes that include histone deacetylases (HDACs). In addition, DNA methyltransferases of mammals appear to interact with HDACs. Experiments with animal cells have shown that HDACs are responsible for part of the repressive effect of DNA methylation. Evidence was found in Neurospora that protein acetylation can in some cases affect DNA methylation. The available data suggest that the roles of DNA methylation and histone hypoacetylation, and their relationship with each other, can vary, even within an organism. Some open questions in this emerging field that should be answered in the near future are discussed.     

Disease resistance in farm animals

Genetic variations in disease resistance of farm animals can be observed at all levels of defence against infectious agents. In most cases susceptibility to infections has polygenic origins. In domestic animals only a few instances of a single genetic locus responsible for disease resistance are known. A well-examined example is the Mx1 gene product of certain mice strains conferring selective resistance to influenza virus infections. Attempts to improve disease resistance by gene transfer of different gene constructs into farm animals include the use of monoclonal antibody gene constructs, transgenes consisting of antisense RNA genes directed against viruses and Mx1 cDNA containing transgenes.     

Disease resistance in farm animals

Genetic variations in disease resistance of farm animals can be observed at all levels of defence against infectious agents. In most cases susceptibility to infections has polygenic origins. In domestic animals only a few instances of a single genetic locus responsible for disease resistance are known. A well-examined example is the Mx1 gene product of certain mice strains conferring selective resistance to influenza virus infections. Attempts to improve disease resistance by gene transfer of different gene constructs into farm animals include the use of monoclonal antibody gene constructs, transgenes consisting of antisense RNA genes directed against viruses and Mx1 cDNA containing transgenes.     

Single-copy T-DNAs integrated at different positions in the Arabidopsis genome display uniform and comparable β-glucuronidase accumulation levels

This study aimed at determining whether transgene expression variability is observed in single-copy T-DNA plants and whether it can be correlated with the T-DNA integration position. Among a population of 135 Arabidopsis thaliana transformants, selected on the basis of antibiotic resistance marker expression, 21 single-copy T-DNA transformants were identified and characterized. In 19 of these 21 lines, 35S-beta-glucuronidase transgene expression, measured in two subsequent generations, was similar. This observation means that the intra-transformant variability was as high as the inter-transformant variability. Integration into an intergenic or genic region, into an exon or intron, in sense or antisense orientation, did not result in differential transgene expression. Remarkably, single-copy transformants were not always the highest expressers, implying that low transgene expression is not always induced by multicopy transformants. In only 2 of the 21 single-copy plants was the transgene expression more than 20-fold lower. However, characteristics of the insertion position in one of these lines did not differ significantly when compared to high-expressing lines. In the remaining line, methylation of the transgene was clearly demonstrated. In conclusion, screening for single-copy T-DNA transformants greatly enriches for stable and high transgene expression, because the integration position is not a major determinant of transgene expression variability in Arabidopsis.     

The clostridial mobilisable transposons

Mobilisable transposons are transposable genetic elements that also encode mobilisation functions but are not in themselves conjugative. They rely on coresident conjugative elements to facilitate their transfer to recipient cells. Clostridial mobilisable transposons include Tn4451 and Tn4452 from Clostridium perfringens, and Tn4453a and Tn4453b from Clostridium difficile, all of which are closely related, and Tn5398 from C. difficile. The Tn4451 group of elements encodes resistance to chloramphenicol and is unusual in that transposition is dependent upon a large resolvase protein rather than a more conventional transposase or integrase. This group of elements also encodes the mobilisation protein TnpZ that, by acting at the RS_A or oriT site located on the transposon, and in the presence of a coresident conjugative element, promotes the movement of the nonreplicating circular intermediate and of plasmids on which the transposon resides. The erythromycin resistance element Tn5398 is unique in that it encodes no readily identifiable transposition or mobilisation proteins. However, the element is still capable of intraspecific transfer between C. difficile isolates, by an unknown mechanism. The detailed analysis of these mobilisable clostridial elements provides evidence that the evolution and dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes is a complex process that may involve the interaction of genetic elements with very different properties. RID="*" ID="*"Corresponding author.