共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
把厂商的污染治理投资区分为概念性污染治理投资和操作性污染治理投资,并以概念性污染治理投资率、操作性污染治理投资率和排污权交易量为决策变量,以厂商的累积污染削减量、排污权存储量和排污率为状态变量,以计划期内的总污染治理成本为目标函数,建立了一个跨期间排污权交易条件下的厂商污染治理投资动态控制模型.分析了概念性污染治理投资、操作性污染治理投资和排污权交易量对厂商累积污染削减量、排污权存储量和排污率的动态影响,给出了动态最优的概念性污染治理投资策略、操作性污染治理投资策略和最优的排污权交易量策略. 相似文献
2.
基于排污权交易的厂商污染治理投资控制策略及控制过程研究 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
排污权交易制度使厂商在购买排污权和污染治理投资之间做出对自己有利的选择,如果因污染治理技术创新而节省的费用大于购买排污权的费用,厂商就会因技术革新而提高竞争能力,这将极大地调动厂商治理污染投资的积极性,并在经济利益的驱动下不断采用先进的污染治理技术和手段.据此,建立了排污权交易条件下厂商污染治理投资的控制模型,并根据不同的规划时间分析了厂商污染治理投资最优控制过程. 相似文献
3.
实物期权在厂商污染治理技术投资策略中的应用 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
由于在排污权交易条件下选择污染治理技术的自由留给了厂商,如果因污染治理技术投资而节省的费用大于购买排污权的费用,则厂商就会选择污染治理技术投资,因此,厂商需要进行污染治理技术投资策略的选择。基于实物期权理论建立了排污权交易条件下厂商污染治理技术投资策略模型,并给出了厂商污染治理技术投资的最佳时机。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
寡头垄断市场中的排污权交易分析 总被引:3,自引:0,他引:3
排污权交易作为一项防止和治理环境污染的制度,已在全球范围引起了高度的重视。建立了寡头垄断市场中的排污权交易博弈模型,分析了不同污染治理能力和污染治理成本厂商的纳什均衡及其获得的收益,讨论了古诺无限次重复博弈模型中厂商实现较高效率的均衡条件。 相似文献
8.
9.
10.
11.
《系统工程理论与实践》2014,(5)
正August 10-14,2015Beijing,ChinaThe International Congress on Industrial and Applied Mathematics(ICIAM)is the premier international congress in the field of applied mathematics held every four years under the auspices of the International Council for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.From August 10 to 14,2015,mathematicians,scientists 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
《系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)》2014,(2)
正AF:Any Field The School of Economics and Management at Tsinghua University(Tsinghua SEM)invites applications for faculty positions at all levels(Assistant Professor,Associate Professor and Full Professor)in any fields of business administration and management.Tsinghua SEM is the only school 相似文献
15.
16.
17.
《系统科学与系统工程学报(英文版)》2014,(4)
正June 22-24,2015Guangzhou,China http://iec.cnsba.com/index.htmlCo-Sponsored by:ffiEE SMC(pending)South China University of Technology The Chinese University of Hong Kong Tsinghua UniversityHosted bv:School of Business Administration,South China University of Technology,China Conference Co-Chairs: 相似文献
18.
19.
20.
The paper is about negotiating with issues that discourage innovation. The subject is environmental deterioration, with concern directed at the impediments that keep it from being innovatively resolved. The paper is organized around three issues. (1) The dominant model of environmental concern, called environmental protection, is managed predominantly via command and control approaches. (2) Command and control, by relying on analytical segmentation to subdivide the problem into digestible bits and using formal legislation to direct it, are not up to emerging challenges in the area. (3) More robust models are available but difficult to experiment with due to impediments that discourage change. These impediments are seen in ideals associated with protection, prevention, recycling, and sustainability that tend to do more to sustain harmful practices than to seek beneficial alternatives. Being able to appreciate the underlying restrictions of entropy could help stimulate a more innovative agenda. These issues are tested via a project funded by the EPA entitled ENERGY STAR Homes. 相似文献