On trend extraction models: Interpretation,empirical evidence and forecasting performance

This paper deals with the economic interpretation of the unobserved components model in the light of the apparent problem posed by previous work in that several practiced methodologies seem to lead to very different models of certain economic variables. A detailed empirical analysis is carried out to show how the failure in obtaining quasi-orthogonal components can seriously bias the interpretation of some decomposition procedures. Finally, the forecasting performance (in both the short and long run) of these decomposition models is analyzed in comparison with other alternatives.     

Updating the forecast function of ARIMA models and the link with DLMs

This paper shows that the whole forecast function of ARIMA time series models, and not just the eventual forecast function, may be updated each time an observation is received. The paper also shows that the coefficients in the updating equations for the forecast function may be expressed in exactly the same form as the Kalman filter updating equations for canonical time series DLMs. Moreover, the adaptive factors in the updating equations are shown to be a simple function of the ARIMA model parameters. Copyright © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The implementation of forecasting models

The use of forecasting models can help managers make better decisions, a fact that motivates this study. Findings from research on the implementation of operations research/management science are generalized to include forecasting models. The similarity between forecasting and other models allows conclusions to be drawn about managing forecasting model implementation: these include better management support, closer links to management performance, improved user–preparer relationships, more goal congruence, minimized perception of change and an appropriate configuration of the forecasting system to user needs, style, resources and environment.     

ARARMA models for time series analysis and forecasting

Methods of time series forecasting are proposed which can be applied automatically. However, they are not rote formulae, since they are based on a flexible philosophy which can provide several models for consideration. In addition it provides diverse diagnostics for qualitatively and quantitatively estimating how well one can forecast a series. The models considered are called ARARMA models (or ARAR models) because the model fitted to a long memory time series (t) is based on sophisticated time series analysis of AR (or ARMA) schemes (short memory models) fitted to residuals Y(t) obtained by parsimonious‘best lag’non-stationary autoregression. Both long range and short range forecasts are provided by an ARARMA model Section 1 explains the philosophy of our approach to time series model identification. Sections 2 and 3 attempt to relate our approach to some standard approaches to forecasting; exponential smoothing methods are developed from the point of view of prediction theory (section 2) and extended (section 3). ARARMA models are introduced (section 4). Methods of ARARMA model fitting are outlined (sections 5,6). Since‘the proof of the pudding is in the eating’, the methods proposed are illustrated (section 7) using the classic example of international airline passengers.     

The importance of non-linearities in large forecasting models with stochastic error processes

This paper considers the consequences of the stochastic error process in large non-linear forecasting models. As such models are non-linear, the deterministic forecast is neither the mean nor the mode of the density function of the endogenous variables. Under a specific assumption as to the class of the non-linearity it is shown that the deterministic forecast is actually the vector of marginal medians of the density function. Stochastic simulation techniques are then used to test whether one large forecasting model actually lies within this class.     

Dynamic relationship analysis of us gasoline and crude oil prices

This paper studies the dynamic relationships between US gasoline prices, crude oil prices, and the stock of gasoline. Using monthly data between January 1973 and December 1987, we find that the US gasoline price is mainly influenced by the price of crude oil. The stock of gasoline has little or no influence on the price of gasoline during the period before the second energy crisis, and seems to have some influence during the period after. We also find that the dynamic relationship between the prices of gasoline and crude oil changes over time, shifting from a longer lag response to a shorter lag response. Box-Jenkins ARIMA and transfer function models are employed in this study. These models are estimated using estimation procedure with and without outlier adjustment. For model estimation with outlier adjustment, an iterative procedure for the joint estimation of model parameters and outlier effects is employed. The forecasting performance of these models is carefully examined. For the purpose of illustration, we also analyze these time series using classical white-noise regression models. The results show the importance of using appropriate time-series methods in modeling and forecasting when the data are serially correlated. This paper also demonstrates the problems of time-series modeling when outliers are present.     

Using the bootstrap for improved ARIMA model identification

This paper presents a new method of identifying ARIMA time-series models. We use the bootstrap technique in estimating the distribution of sample autocorrelations both separately and in a simultaneous inference setting. The bootstrap has the advantage of being nonparametric and thus free of reliance on asymptotic normality, which may not hold for short or medium-size series. The simultaneous procedure is unique, as it has no feasible parametric alternatives. An application to exchange rates illustrates our methodology. In the example chosen, we are able to produce better forecasts using the model identified via the bootstrap technique.     

Prediction intervals for exponential smoothing using two new classes of state space models

Three general classes of state space models are presented, using the single source of error formulation. The first class is the standard linear model with homoscedastic errors, the second retains the linear structure but incorporates a dynamic form of heteroscedasticity, and the third allows for non‐linear structure in the observation equation as well as heteroscedasticity. These three classes provide stochastic models for a wide variety of exponential smoothing methods. We use these classes to provide exact analytic (matrix) expressions for forecast error variances that can be used to construct prediction intervals one or multiple steps ahead. These formulas are reduced to non‐matrix expressions for 15 state space models that underlie the most common exponential smoothing methods. We discuss relationships between our expressions and previous suggestions for finding forecast error variances and prediction intervals for exponential smoothing methods. Simpler approximations are developed for the more complex schemes and their validity examined. The paper concludes with a numerical example using a non‐linear model. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.