实践与可接受性:布尔迪厄实践语义学的建构

布尔迪厄实践语义学契合了普特南关于可能的语义学建构需要一个精确的关于语言使用者的一般模型的思路。但普特南以语言劳动分工为基础,而布尔迪厄诉诸实践;普特南把意义定义为包含外延在内的向量,继而把决定外延的工作归给了社会,布尔迪厄则把意义界定为价格,而价格取决于语言产品的可接受性。正是这两个区分及其所暗含的社会性视角的深层异质性构成了普特南与布尔迪厄之间的最大差异,也标示了布尔迪厄实践语义学的独特理论风格及其价值所在。

Practice and Acceptability:Bourdieu's Semantics of Practice

While Putnam appeals to a general and precise model of a language-user,Bourdieu constructs his Semantics of Practice.It is obvious that Putnam depends on division of linguistic labor while Bourdieu on linguistic practice.Besides,meanings is identified by Putnam as a vector including the extension which is determined socially and not individually,and defined by Bourdieu as price which rests with its social acceptability.It is these distinction and their points of sociology demonstrate the clearest difference...