| 作为方法论的思想考古学 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 康洁,熊和平.作为方法论的思想考古学[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(10):99-102,112. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 康洁 熊和平 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 宁波大学,法学院,浙江,宁波,315211
2. 宁波工程学院,社科系,浙江,宁波,315010 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 福柯的人文科学考古学与库恩的科学哲学分别在不同的知识领域揭示了知识话语的冲突机制,因而可视为思想考古学的两个来源.他们的研究存在几个共同的前提性观点:非连续性历史观、非中心化的主体观、实践性的知识观、不确定性的语言观和微观性的权力观.这些前提性观点使思想考古学成为当代学者分析与解读社会现象的一种重要的方法论.
|
| 关 键 词： | 方法论 思想考古学 福柯 库恩 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8934（2005）10-0099-04 |
| 收稿时间： | 2005-03-10 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005-03-10 |
Thought Archeology as Methodology |
| |
| KANG Jie,XIONG He-ping.Thought Archeology as Methodology[J].Studies In Dialectics of Nature,2005,21(10):99-102,112. |
| |
| Authors: | KANG Jie XIONG He-ping |
| |
| Institution: | 1, Law School of Ningbo Univershy,Ningbo 315211 ,China;2, Social Science Dept, of Ningbo Technology College,Ningbo 315010,China |
| |
| Abstract: | Thought archeology has two theoretical sources: one is archeology of human science of M.Foucault's;the another is science philosophy of T.Kuhn's.both of which scooped out the clashing mechanism in the different knowledge realm. There exist several premising standpoints of the two philosophers,namely,non-continuous history view;non-centering corpus view;practising knowledge view;indetermination language view;tiny power view,which makes a result that thought archeology is increasing growing up as an important methodology of examining present social phenomena. |
| |
| Keywords: | thought archeology methodology M Foucauh T Kuhn |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
