首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

从社会福利最大化视角确定EPR管制标准
引用本文:田海峰,李凯,孙广生.从社会福利最大化视角确定EPR管制标准[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2012,33(11):1669-1672.
作者姓名:田海峰  李凯  孙广生
作者单位:东北大学工商管理学院,辽宁沈阳,110819
基金项目:基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目,教育部人文社会科学研究项目,中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目
摘    要:构建了包括生产者和消费者在内的产品生命周期模型.基于社会福利最大化的视角,在一个统一的模型中探讨了最优循环性管制标准和减量化管制标准的确定问题,以及影响最优管制标准的主要因素.研究表明,要素投入的边际产品价值等于其净价格是实现社会福利最大化的条件;而回收再利用成本、要素的边际贡献、物质投入的价格、废弃物的处置费用是影响最优管制标准的重要因素.因此,政策制定者在制定EPR管制标准时,不能片面追求环境绩效还应兼顾经济绩效,以实现社会福利最大化.

关 键 词:生产者责任延伸  管制政策  固体废弃物  管制标准  社会福利最大化  

Determination of the EPR Regulation Standards from the Perspective of Social Welfare Maximization
Tian,Hai-Feng ,Li,Kai ,Sun,Guang-Sheng.Determination of the EPR Regulation Standards from the Perspective of Social Welfare Maximization[J].Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science),2012,33(11):1669-1672.
Authors:Tian  Hai-Feng  Li  Kai  Sun  Guang-Sheng
Institution:(1) School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, China
Abstract:From the perspective of social welfare maximization, a product life cycle model involving both producers and consumers was built in which the regulation standards for both recycling and reducing were determined, and the major factors affecting the optimal standards were discussed. The results showed that the socially optimal condition is reached when the value of each marginal product equals its net price, and the recycling cost, input's marginal contribution, price of material input, cost of waste disposal are the most important factors for the optimal standards. Therefore, in order to maximize the social welfare, policy makers should take both environmental and economic performances into account while making EPR (extended producer responsibility) regulation policies.
Keywords:extended producer responsibility (EPR)  regulation policy  solid waste  regulationstandard  social welfare maximization
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号