中韩两国大学生肥胖状况的比较及对BMI评价标准的修正

采用BIA法对2 570名中、韩大学生进行了BMI及体脂率的测试,其中,中国男生523人、女生1 201人,韩国男生322人、女生524人.认为韩国女生＂偏瘦＂类型的比例远高于中国女生,两国女生＂正常＂类型的比例远高于两国男生,两国男生的＂超重＂和＂肥胖＂类型的比例均大于两国女生.运用BMI与体脂率分别对同一样本评价时,其结果两种方法在各类型中所占比例大部分差异较大.另外,各类型体脂率标准值所对应的BMI均值与BMI亚太及中国大陆标准值大部分存在差异.以BIA法测得的体脂率为基准,对BMI评价标准修正后的男大学生标准是：BMI〈20.0为偏瘦,20.0≤BMI〈22.5为正常,22.5≤BMI〈25.0为超重,25.0≤BMI为肥胖;女大学生标准是：BMI〈18.5为偏瘦,18.5≤BMI〈23.0为正常,23.0≤BMI〈27.0为超重,27.0≤BMI为肥胖.

The comparison on obesity between university students of the two countries in Korea and China,and correct the BMI evaluation standard

In this study,2570 university students were randomly selected by BMI and %BF test by BIA,among whom 523 schoolboys and 1201 schoolgirls were from China and 322 schoolboys and 524 schoolgirls were from Korea.The results from the survey suggest that：The proportion of thinner schoolgirls in Korea is higher than the schoolgirls＇ in China.The proportion of normal schoolgirls in Korea and China is higher than the schoolboys＇ in Korea and China.The proportion of overweight and obesity schoolboys in Korea and China is higher than the schoolgirls＇ in Korea and China.When the same sample was evaluated by BMI and %BF,the results of two methods in all types share a larger proportion of most of the difference.Most of the differences of the various types of body %BF rate of the standard value corresponding to the average value of BMI and BMI standard values of the Asia-pacific and China.BIA measured by %BF benchmark.Male university students in the evaluation criteria revised standard：BMI20.0 is thinner,20.0≤BMI22.5 is normal,22.5≤BMI25.0 is overweight,25.0≤BMI is obesity.Male university students in the evaluation criteria revised standard：BMI18.5 is thinner,18.5≤BMI23.0 is normal,23.0≤BMI27.0 is overweight,27.0≤BMI is obesity.