首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

雅典的民主与苏格拉底之死——雅典直接民主制下多数人暴政的成因
引用本文:刘翀.雅典的民主与苏格拉底之死——雅典直接民主制下多数人暴政的成因[J].芜湖职业技术学院学报,2009,11(1):31-33.
作者姓名:刘翀
作者单位:安徽芜湖市委党校,安徽,芜湖,241000
摘    要:雅典的直接民主因为奉行绝对的多数统治,因而蕴藏着走向专制和暴政的危险。而雅典民主政治中的相关制度设计却不曾对多数权力进行丝毫制约,个人的基本权利和自由在城邦生活中也无处可觅,普遍的参与并没有带来充分和有效的参与,反而降低了民主的质量和效果。这一切都构成了雅典城邦直接民主制下多数人暴政的原因,也使苏格拉底悲剧的发生无法避免。

关 键 词:多数规则  多数人暴政  基本权利与自由  有效参与

Athens' Democracy and the Death of Socrates——On the Reasons of Majority Tyranny Caused by Direct Democracy in Athens
LIU Chong.Athens'''' Democracy and the Death of Socrates——On the Reasons of Majority Tyranny Caused by Direct Democracy in Athens[J].Journal of Wuhu Vocational Institute of Technology,2009,11(1):31-33.
Authors:LIU Chong
Abstract:Athens' direct democracy pursued the majority rule absolutely, which contains the danger of tyranny. Nevertheless, the design of political system failed to restrict the majority power. Personal fundamental rights and freedom had no place in city-state of Athens. Popular participation made no contribution to effective participation and did harm to the effectiveness of democracy instead. All of these leads to the majority tyranny and makes the death of Socrates inevitable.
Keywords:majority rule  majority tyranny  fundamental richts and freedom  effective participation  
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号