首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

静脉输液拔针后两种按压方法比较
引用本文:沙拉,哈申高娃,王桂兰.静脉输液拔针后两种按压方法比较[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2005,20(4):475-476.
作者姓名:沙拉  哈申高娃  王桂兰
作者单位:内蒙古民族大学,附属医院,内蒙古,通辽,028000
摘    要:静脉输液是临床上治疗疾病的重要方法之一,也是应用最广泛的基本护理操作,为保护好静脉,减轻病人的痛苦和皮下瘀血,对2004年8~12月肿瘤科收住的120(204次)肿瘤病患者,行静脉输液拔针的传统指压法与改进的直压法皮下瘀血情况及按压疼痛表现程度等两项指标进行了对照分析,结果二者均有显著性差异,直压法优于指压法.

关 键 词:静脉输液  拔针  比较
文章编号:1671-0185(2005)04-0475-02
修稿时间:2005年1月10日

Comparison of Two Compression Methods after Withdrawal of Needles at the End of Venous Transfusion
Shala,Hashengaowa,WANG Gui-lan.Comparison of Two Compression Methods after Withdrawal of Needles at the End of Venous Transfusion[J].Journal of Inner Mongolia University for the Nationalities(Natural Sciences),2005,20(4):475-476.
Authors:Shala  Hashengaowa  WANG Gui-lan
Abstract:Venous transfusion is not only an important approach to cure diseases but also a basic nursing measure.To protect punctured veins and ease patients,the merits and demerits of tradtional digital compression and improved cotton-swab compression were carefully analysed.120 Inpatients'(204 cases of venous transfusion,hospitalized in Dept.of Oncology from Aug.to Dec.2004) range of subdemic stagnant blood and level of pain,which happened to the spot where the needle was punctured and compressed with two kinds of the compression hemostasis,were compared.The results suggested that cotton-swab compression is superior to digital compression.
Keywords:Venous transfusion  Withdrawal of needles  Comparison
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号