疝环充填式无张力疝修补术与传疝修补术的比较

目的：总结比较疝环充填式无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术的治疗效果。方法；使用美国巴德公司的疝环充填物及网状补片，对68例病人从手术方法及时间、手术指征、术后病人自主能力的恢复、术后并发症、住院时间和复发率等进行比较观察。结果：该术式与传统疝修补术相比较具有方法简便、手术指征宽、恢复快、住院时间短、并发症少和复发率低的优点。结论：疝环充填式无张力疝修补术是一种完全符合生理解剖的手术方法，尤其适合老年和伴有其它疾病者，具有传统术式无法比拟的优点。

Plug and mesh hernia repair and its comparison to the traditional procedure

Objective:To summarize and compare the result between plug and mesh hernia repair and traditional procedure.Methods 68 patients were treated by mesh and plug hernia repair with Bard Mesh and Perfix Plug,C.R. Bard Inc..The operative procedure,surgical indication,ability recovery,postoperative pain,complications,hospitalized period and recurrence rate were observed and compared.Results The mesh and plug hernia repair had a greater advantage than the traditional hernia repair procedure,such as easier surgical performance,a wider surgical indication,less postoperative pain,quicker recovery,shorter period of hospitalization,fewer complications and lower recurrence.Conclusion: It is the currently most popular choice for a convenient hernia repair procedure.It has been an outstanding method in treating groin than traditional procedure.