首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于模糊相似优先比法的济南四大泉群补给来源
引用本文:李江柏,邢立亭,侯玉松,邢学睿,邓忠,张凤娟,孟庆晗,武东强.基于模糊相似优先比法的济南四大泉群补给来源[J].科学技术与工程,2021,21(3):918-926.
作者姓名:李江柏  邢立亭  侯玉松  邢学睿  邓忠  张凤娟  孟庆晗  武东强
作者单位:济南大学水利与环境学院,济南 250022;济南大学水利与环境学院,济南 250022;济南大学水利与环境学院,济南 250022;山东正元地质资源勘查有限责任公司,济南 250101;山东正元地质资源勘查有限责任公司,济南 250101;山东正元地质资源勘查有限责任公司,济南 250101;济南大学水利与环境学院,济南 250022;济南大学水利与环境学院,济南 250022
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41772257、41472216)、山东省高校院所创新团队项目(2018GXRC012)、济南大学科技计划项目(XKY1922)、沂沭河流域岩溶水开采布局优化及地下水动态预测(SDYJ-QNKY02002)
摘    要:为维持济南四大泉群持续喷涌,探明泉水的补给来源尤为重要.以补给区岩溶水与泉水水化学特征为依据,利用模糊相似优先比法确定趵突泉、黑虎泉、潭西泉、珍珠泉模糊相似优先顺序,结合泉群出露区地质、水文地质条件以及泉水水质、水温、水位、电导率数据,对四大泉群补给来源进行研究.可以得出:①泉水主要受东南、西南、正南方向岩溶水补给,且四大泉群主要受到寒武系张夏组岩溶水以及寒武系凤山组-奥陶系岩溶水混合补给;②趵突泉接受西南、正南、东南方向奥陶系岩溶水补给较多,黑虎泉接受其东部以及正南方向奥陶系岩溶水补给较多,潭西泉接受西南、正南方向寒武系岩溶水补给较多,珍珠泉主要接受东南寒武系岩溶水补给;③四大泉群泉水形成模式不同,趵突泉泉群与黑虎泉泉群主要表现为寒武系凤山组-奥陶系岩溶水通过局部侵入岩的天窗喷出排泄,其循环深度较浅,属于侵蚀成泉.五龙潭泉群和珍珠泉泉群主要表现为寒武系张夏组岩溶水通过侵入岩裂隙喷出地表,其循环深度较深,属于接触带成泉.四大泉群补给来源的研究,为泉水保护工作提供了科学依据.

关 键 词:模糊相似优先比法  岩溶水  补给来源  泉水形成模式  济南
收稿时间:2020/3/6 0:00:00
修稿时间:2020/10/25 0:00:00

Replenishment Sources of Four Great Springs in Jinan Based on Fuzzy Similarity Priority Ratio
Li Jiangbai,Xing Liting,Hou Yusong,Xing Xuerui,Deng Zhong,Zhang Fengjuan,Meng Qinghan,Wu Dongqiang.Replenishment Sources of Four Great Springs in Jinan Based on Fuzzy Similarity Priority Ratio[J].Science Technology and Engineering,2021,21(3):918-926.
Authors:Li Jiangbai  Xing Liting  Hou Yusong  Xing Xuerui  Deng Zhong  Zhang Fengjuan  Meng Qinghan  Wu Dongqiang
Institution:School of water resources and environment,University of Jinan;Shandong Zhengyuan geological resources exploration Co,Ltd
Abstract:In order to maintain the continuous gushing of the four major springs in Jinan, it is particularly important to ascertain the source of spring water recharging. Based on the chemical characteristics of karst water and spring water in the recharge area, the fuzzy similarity priority ratio method was used to determine the priority order of fuzzy similarity of Baotu Spring, Heihu Spring, Tanxi Spring, and Pearl Spring. Combined with the geological and hydrogeological conditions of the spring group outcropping area and the data of spring water quality, water temperature, water level and conductivity, the recharge sources of the four spring groups was studied. It can be concluded that: 1) the spring water is mainly recharged by karst water in the southeast, southwest, and south direction, and the four major spring groups are mainly recharged by the karst water of the Cambrian Zhangxia Formation and the Cambrian Fengshan Formation-Ordovician karst water; 2) Baotu Spring receives more Ordovician karst water replenishment in southwest, south, and southeast directions, Heihu Spring receives more Ordovician karst water replenishment in its east and south directions, and Tanxi Spring accepts more Cambrian karst in southwest and south directions. Pearl spring mainly receives karst water recharge from the southeastern Cambrian; 3) The formation patterns of the four major springs are different. The Baotu Spring groups and the Heihu Spring groups are mainly manifested as Cambrian Fengshan Formation-Ordovician karst water ejected and excreted through the skylight of locally intrusive rocks, and their circulation depth are shallow, belonging to erosion into a spring. The Wulongtan Spring groups and the Pearl Spring groups are mainly manifested as Cambrian Zhangxia Formation karst water ejected from the ground through intrusive rock fissures, and their circulation depth are deep, belonging to the contact zone formation spring. The research on the sources of the four major springs provides a scientific basis for spring protection.
Keywords:fuzzy similarity priority ratio method      karst water      recharge source      spring water formation model      Jinan
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科学技术与工程》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科学技术与工程》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号