首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

采用无网格伽辽金法求解电容层析成像正问题
引用本文:王化祥,张立峰.采用无网格伽辽金法求解电容层析成像正问题[J].天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2006,39(11):1379-1383.
作者姓名:王化祥  张立峰
作者单位:天津大学电气与自动化工程学院,天津300072
基金项目:国家自然科学基金;国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);河南省自然科学基金
摘    要:由于有限元法求解电容层析成像正问题的计算准备及后处理非常费时,对正问题的三维求解造成了瓶颈,为此,提出采用无网格伽辽金法求解电容层析成像正问题,获得正问题的弱变分形式,并用拉格朗日乘子法施加边界条件,从而得到数值解.在同样的仿真条件下,2种方法的计算时间分别为14.046S和5.078S.对5种典型流型进行仿真,结果表明,2种方法计算结果的最大相对误差为2.25%.因此,无网格伽辽金法与有限元法具有相当的精度,且计算速度有较大提高.

关 键 词:电容层析成像  正问题  有限元法  无网格法  移动最小二乘法
文章编号:0493-2137(2006)11-1379-05
收稿时间:2006-02-14
修稿时间:2006-02-142006-06-14

Solution of Forward Problem for Electrical Capacitance Tomography Based on Element-Free Galerkin Method
WANG Hua-xiang,ZHANG Li-feng.Solution of Forward Problem for Electrical Capacitance Tomography Based on Element-Free Galerkin Method[J].Journal of Tianjin University(Science and Technology),2006,39(11):1379-1383.
Authors:WANG Hua-xiang  ZHANG Li-feng
Institution:School of Electrical and Automation Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
Abstract:Electrical capacitance tomography(ECT) is often used to identify two-(multi-) phase flow regime and investigate the distribution of solids.Usually,forward problem is solved using finite element method(FEM).But the preparation of data and postprocessing for this method are time-consuming.This leads to the three-dimensional computation bottleneck for ECT.For this reason,the element-free Galerkin method(EFGM) is proposed.In this method,in order to obtain the numerical solution,the shape function is constructed by moving least square(MLS),the weak form of the variational equation of the studied problem is used to deduce the discrete equation and Lagrange multipliers are used to satisfy essential boundary conditions.Compared with FEM that needs elements, only nodal data are necessary in EFGM.The computation time for these two methods are 14.046 s and 5.078 s respectively on the same simulation conditions.Finally,simulation research is done for five typical flow regimes using FEM and EFGM,respectively.Simulation results show that EFGM has the(tiny) difference in accuracy compared with FEM,the maximum relative error for the computation results of these two methods is 2.25~%,while computation speed improves greatly.
Keywords:electrical capacitance tomography(ECT)  forward problem  finite element method  element-free method  moving least square
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号