首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

L悬臂型内锥流量计可膨胀系数仿真与实验研究
引用本文:徐英,王磊,崔铭芳,李振林,李刚,张涛.L悬臂型内锥流量计可膨胀系数仿真与实验研究[J].天津大学学报(自然科学与工程技术版),2009,42(11):945-951.
作者姓名:徐英  王磊  崔铭芳  李振林  李刚  张涛
作者单位:天津大学电气与自动化工程学院天津市过程检测与控制重点实验室,天津,300072 
基金项目:国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)资助项目,天津市应用基础及前沿技术研究计划资助项目 
摘    要:为获得内锥流量计高准确度的可膨胀系数数学模型,实验样机等效直径比分别设计为0.45、0.55、0.65、0.75和0.85,利用计算流体动力学(CFD)方法对悬臂型内锥流量计进行了可膨胀系数的仿真实验,获得了可膨胀系数的CFD预测公式模型.同时,利用正压法音速喷嘴气体流量标准装置,进行了可膨胀系数的实流实验,获得了实验拟合的经验公式模型.通过对两类公式模型与实验结果的比较,得出CFD预测模型的相对误差平均值为0.77%,最大值为1.66%,均方根误差平均值为0.92%,最大值为1.97%;实验经验模型的相对误差平均值为0.25%,最大值为0.42%,均方根误差平均值为0.30%,最大值为0.51%.

关 键 词:L悬臂型内锥流量计  计算流体力学  RNG  k-ε湍流模型  实流实验  等效直径比  可膨胀系数  均方根误差

Simulation and Experimental Research on the Expansibility Factor for Cone Flowmeters with L-Cantilever
XU Ying,WANG Lei,CUI Ming-fang,LI Zhen-lin,LI Gang,ZHANG Tao.Simulation and Experimental Research on the Expansibility Factor for Cone Flowmeters with L-Cantilever[J].Journal of Tianjin University(Science and Technology),2009,42(11):945-951.
Authors:XU Ying  WANG Lei  CUI Ming-fang  LI Zhen-lin  LI Gang  ZHANG Tao
Institution:(Tianjin Key Laboratory for Process Measurement and Control ,School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Yianjin University,Tianjin 300072, China)
Abstract:In order to acquire a higher accuracy mathematical model of expansibility factor for cone flowmeters with Lcantileve,a set of test prototypes with the equivalent diameter ratios of 0.45,0.55,0.65,0.75 and 0.85 respectively were designed. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) method,a simulation research for the expansibility factor was carried out, resulting in a CFD predictive equation of the expansibility factor, Meanwhile,a fitting equation of the expansibility factor was obtained from the corresponding experimental research ,which was completed on the gas flow calibration device based on the critical flow sonic nozzles using the positive pressure method. Comparing the two predictive equations and the experiment results respectively,the average and the biggest values of the relative error of CFD predictive equation are 0.77% and 1.66%, respectively. As for the experiment predictive equation,0.25% and 0.42% respectively. Besides,the square averaged root error was also analyzed as following :the average and the biggest values of CFD predictive equation are 0.92% and 1,97% respectively ;as for the experiment predictive equation ,0.30% and 0.51% respectively.
Keywords:cone flowmeter with L-cantilever  computation fluid dynamics (CFD)  real flow experiment  equivalent diameter ratio  expansibility factor  square averaged root error
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号