| 请求权与债权的法理比较分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘劲松.请求权与债权的法理比较分析[J].萍乡高等专科学校学报,2010,27(4):27-30. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘劲松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东师范大学,政法学院,山东,济南,250014 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 济南市社科规划研究项目"济南市民间投资的市场准入法律制度研究"的阶段性成果;课题编号 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 请求权是债权的救济性权利,是为了债权的救济名正言顺的通向公力救济而产生的。两者既不是一项权能,也不是纯粹的程序性权利。这种法理关系的分析,不仅关系到实体权与程序权的衔接,而且对私权利的保护救济以及权利的界定和权利的分类等具有丰富的法理学价值的问题。
|
| 关 键 词： | 请求权 债权 债权请求权 法理分析 |
Legal Principle Theory of Law Analysis Comparatively On Requests Rights and Creditor's Rights |
| |
| Pan Jinsong.Legal Principle Theory of Law Analysis Comparatively On Requests Rights and Creditor's Rights[J].Journal of Pingxiang College,2010,27(4):27-30. |
| |
| Authors: | Pan Jinsong |
| |
| Institution: | Pan Jinsong (School of Law Science,Shandong Normal University,Ji＇nan 250014,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Requested rights are the creditor＇s relief right,which produces for the creditor＇s rights relief. Both of the two are already not an item of power,also they are not the procedural right. The legal principle theory of law relations analysis not only relates to the entity power and the procedure power engagement,moreover,it has the legal principle theory of law value to the private right relief. |
| |
| Keywords: | creditor＇s rights requests rights right of the obligatory claim legal principle theory of law analysis |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
