| 论焦循的《尚书》学研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈居渊.论焦循的《尚书》学研究[J].贵州师范大学学报(社会科学版),2006(3):8-13. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈居渊 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学哲学系,上海,200433 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 以焦循所撰<尚书补疏>为考察对象,分析焦循对<尚书>这部古经意义的新探索.焦循维护伪<孔传>的经典地位,是他确认伪<孔传>蕴含着"二帝三王之道"的真谛,体现了经典的古代意义与传注的现代诠释的统一,具有思想史上的价值.同时,焦循提出<舜典>未亡、<大禹谟>和<皋陶谟>原为一篇的猜想,现据<郭店楚墓竹简>所提供的文本,倒可备为一说,值得重视.
|
| 关 键 词： | 焦循 尚书补疏 诠释 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-733X（2006）04-0008-06 |
| 收稿时间： | 03 8 2006 12:00AM |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-03-08 |
On Jiao Xun's Shang- shu Learning |
| |
| CHEN Ju-yuan.On Jiao Xun''''s Shang- shu Learning[J].Journal of Guizhou Normal University(Social Science Edition),2006(3):8-13. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Ju-yuan |
| |
| Institution: | Dept. of Philosophy, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Aiming at the "Shang - shu - bu - shu" by Jiao Xun, the paper analyzes the new research of the ancient significance of " Shang - shu" by Jiao Xun. It points out that Jiao defended the classical position of pseudograph "Kong - chuan" in order to affirm the "Kingcraft of Er Huang and San Wang" in it, which embodies the unite of ancient significance of classics and modem hermeneutics of annotation and posses its own value in the intellectual history. Meanwhile, Jiao suggested that "Yao-dian" had not disappeared and "Da - yu - mo" and " Gao - tao - mo" were originally of the same piece, which worthed it while referring to the texts from "Guodian Tomb no.1" and should be laid more emphasis on. |
| |
| Keywords: | Jiao Xun "Shang - shu - bu - shu" annotation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
