海峡两岸侦查中讯问被追诉人比较研究

在刑事诉讼中讯问犯罪嫌疑人、被告人是侦查程序中的重要一步。讯问犯罪嫌疑人既是获取最直接证据、取得案件突破口的重要途径,也是容易发生践踏公民基本权利的一个程序阶段。通过对比我国大陆和台湾地区刑事诉讼法关于侦查中讯问被追诉人规定之间的不同,可以发现中国大陆在讯问犯罪嫌疑人方面法律规定的不足,主要包括:大陆没有关于犯罪嫌疑人沉默权的规定和告知;除传唤与拘传的讯问之外,法律没有对讯问中的时间、地点和讯问环境作出明确规定;法律对笔录的制作没有作出细致规定。为此,应以现代治国的标准对中国大陆刑事诉讼侦查中讯问犯罪嫌疑人的规定加以改造,从而最终符合实现程序公正和权利保障的基本要求。

Comparative Study on Interrogating Defendants Across the Straits

It＇s an important step in investigating procedure to interrogate the suspects and defendants in criminal case. Interrogating the suspects is an important approach to obtain the most direct evidence and achieve the breakthrough in the case, as well as a procedure to violate the civihans＇ basic rights. Some weak points can be found in terms of interrogating the suspects in Chinese mainland. For instance, there is no regulation and informing about the privilege of silence for suspects; no explicit regulation about the time, place, surroundings of interrogation except summon to court and by force; no detailed regulation on constat by comparing the differences of the regulations about the defendants in the criminal procedure law across the straits. So the regulation of interrogating the suspects in investigating procedure in Chinese mainland should be reformed following the standards of modern governing with the purpose of meeting the basic requirements of realizing the procedural justice and rights guarantee.