论我国刑法中的严格责任

严格责任是英美法中的概念,由于严格责任制度损害人权,英美法严格限制其适用的领域。我国刑法中并没有明文规定无罪过责任,所以所谓"严格责任"在我国刑法中"是否存在"的问题,其实是对我国刑法中责任主义的解释立场问题。我国刑法存在不少违反责任主义的规定,但不存在绝对责任。我国刑法应该承认公害犯罪特殊场合下的"推定责任"的合理性,并应在刑事诉讼中根据推定责任的规则来界定行为人的证明责任,它是在风险社会背景下责任主义松动的表现。而巨额财产来源不明罪中的严格责任,存在原因并非责任主义松动所致。

Talking about Our Country’s Criminal Law’s Strict Liability

The strict liability is a concept in the common law.Because strict liability system damage to human rights,the common law strictly limit its applicable fields.There has not blameless responsibility in our criminal law.So the question of the "whether there is "of the so-called strict liability in our country’s criminal law is the position of explanation of the responsibility in our country criminal law.China’s criminal law has many rules that violate responsibility,but there is no absolute responsibility.Our country criminal law should admit the rationality of "presumed responsibility" under of the special occasions of public nuisance crime,and should define actor proof responsibility according to the rules of the presumed responsibility in the criminal procedure,it is an expression of responsibility loose in the background of risk society.And there exists the strict liability in the crime of huge unidentified property,which can not be caused the reason of responsibility loose.