首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

世界一流科技社团发展现状国际比较——基于实践动态的视角
引用本文:孟凡蓉,马天喜,袁梦,梅苹苹,陈光.世界一流科技社团发展现状国际比较——基于实践动态的视角[J].科技导报(北京),2021,39(10):80-89.
作者姓名:孟凡蓉  马天喜  袁梦  梅苹苹  陈光
作者单位:1. 西安交通大学公共政策与管理学院, 西安 710049;
2. 中国科学院学部工作局, 北京 100190
基金项目:中国科协学会学术部2020年项目
摘    要: 以世界一流科技社团2019年9月-2020年6月的新闻数据,分析总结了世界一流科技社团的实践动态及发展规律。研究发现:(1)国内科技社团强调党建引领,制度优势体现出强大的凝聚力;(2)国外科技社团更加善于聚合公共资源,并将产生的新知识转化为可供应用的产品和服务,推进科技与经济、创新链与产业链的融合;(3)国外科技社团善于通过多种形式发声,充分发挥决策者智库咨询的作用;(4)全球科技治理的实质性活动由国际化大型科技社团主导。中国科技社团需要重视决策咨询智库建设、为政府重大决策制定提供技术支撑;完善学术交流平台、创造有利于科技工作者的良好生态;为科技经济融合贡献智慧,推动互惠共享的国际科技交流合作。

关 键 词:科技社团  国际比较  决策咨询  科技治理  
收稿时间:2020-10-21

International comparison on the development status of world class S&T societies:Based on the dynamic perspective of practice
MENG Fanrong,MA Tianxi,YUAN Meng,MEI Pingping,CHEN Guang.International comparison on the development status of world class S&T societies:Based on the dynamic perspective of practice[J].Science & Technology Review,2021,39(10):80-89.
Authors:MENG Fanrong  MA Tianxi  YUAN Meng  MEI Pingping  CHEN Guang
Institution:1. School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049, China;
2. Bureau of Academic Division, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
Abstract:As the global science and technology innovation has entered a period of unprecedented activity, the importance of the S&T societies becomes increasingly apparent. With the momentum of the national efforts to promote the development of science and technology, it is important for Chinese S&T societies to expand their international perspective and to better appreciate the overall situation of the global S&T societies. This paper takes the world's top S&T societies as an example, traces and analyzes the professional development dynamics of the advanced international S&T societies, and reviews the development of the world's top S&T societies, to provide a benchmark for deepening the governance reform of Chinese S&T societies, and to further strengthen the vitality and the creativity of Chinese S&T societies. The conclusions are as follows:(1) the domestic S&T societies emphasize the party leadership and the institutional strengths that reflect a strong cohesion; (2) foreign S&T societies are better at aggregating public resources and transforming new knowledge into usable products and services, promoting the integration of science and technology with the economy, the innovation chain and the industrial chain; (3) foreign S&T societies are good at making their voices heard in a variety of ways, giving a full play of their role as a think tank for policy makers and decision makers. (4) Substantive activities in the global S&T governance should be led by large international S&T associations. Chinese S&T societies need to pay attention to the construction of policy-making advisory think tanks, provide technical support for major government decisions, improve academic exchange platforms, create a good ecology conducive for the S&T workers to contribute their wisdom to the economic integration of the S&T, and promote mutually beneficial and shared international S&T exchanges and cooperations.
Keywords:S&T society  international comparisons  decision-making consultation  science and technology governance  
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技导报(北京)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技导报(北京)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号