首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

国家科研竞争力评价——以OECD国家基础医学领域为例
引用本文:宋瑶瑶,李陛,王雪,杨国梁.国家科研竞争力评价——以OECD国家基础医学领域为例[J].科技导报(北京),2019,37(14):34-43.
作者姓名:宋瑶瑶  李陛  王雪  杨国梁
作者单位:中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190;中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京100049;中国科学院发展规划局,北京,100864;中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190;中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院,北京100049;中国科学院发展规划局,北京100864
基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71671181);中国科学院发展规划局项目(GHJ-ZLZX-2019-32-5)
摘    要: 以经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家为研究对象,采用一种基于数据包络分析方法的混合定权方法测算各国基础医学领域的科研竞争力指数,并对不同国家的竞争力指数和排名进行了分析。结果表明,美国、英国、德国、日本、法国是28个OECD国家中基础医学领域科研竞争力最强的5个国家。此外,除芬兰、希腊、新西兰和葡萄牙的科研竞争力指数变动较大外,其余各国变动不大。从区域上看,北美洲、北欧和西欧3个区域的平均科研竞争力指数处于前列,南欧和中欧区域处于劣势位置。因此从促进区域科研事业的快速和平衡发展角度看,国家间应当加强科研合作,取长补短,竞争力弱的国家应减小与竞争力强国间的差距。

关 键 词:科研竞争力  三阶段权重模型  数据包络分析
收稿时间:2019-01-03

National scientific research competitiveness evaluation: A case study of basic medical disciplines in OECD countries
SONG Yaoyao,LI Bi,WANG Xue,YANG Guoliang.National scientific research competitiveness evaluation: A case study of basic medical disciplines in OECD countries[J].Science & Technology Review,2019,37(14):34-43.
Authors:SONG Yaoyao  LI Bi  WANG Xue  YANG Guoliang
Institution:1. Institutes of Science and Development, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China;
2. School of Public Policy and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
3. Bureau of Development Planning, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100864, China
Abstract:The evaluation of the national scientific research competitiveness is of great significance to determine the developmental direction of the national scientific research and to guide the development of universities and departments of the government. This paper uses a hybrid weighting method based on the data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure the national scientific research competitiveness index of basic medical disciplines of OECD countries and analyses the competitiveness of different countries and their rankings. The results show that the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan and France have the highest competitiveness index among 28 OECD countries in the field of basic medical disciplines. In addition, the competitiveness of Finland, Greece, New Zealand and Portugal sees a great volatility, but the rest of the OECD countries are in a stable level. From a regional perspective, North America, Northern Europe and Western Europe have higher average scientific research competitiveness index, while Southern and Central Europe are on the low side. Therefore, OECD countries should strengthen their scientific research cooperation, learn from each other. OECD countries with low competitiveness should catch up with the countries with high competitiveness to promote a rapid development and to reach a balance in the regional science and education development.
Keywords:scientific research competitiveness  three-stage weighting model  data envelopment analysis  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《科技导报(北京)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《科技导报(北京)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号