首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论环境侵权中的因果关系推定
引用本文:冯娇雯.论环境侵权中的因果关系推定[J].温州大学学报(自然科学版),2012(6):65-70.
作者姓名:冯娇雯
作者单位:浙江省上虞市人民法院
摘    要:由于环境侵权的特殊性,适用传统理论认定其因果关系困难重重。为此,国外发展出优势证据说等因果关系推定学说,我国现行法并未规定因果关系推定,司法实践中各地做法不一,但也出现了创造性适用因果关系推定理论的案例。为终结同案不同判的现状,我国应当在立法上对因果关系推定做出原则性规定,并通过最高人民法院颁布案例指导的方式,帮助法官灵活适用因果关系推定理论,以期在环境侵权个案中达成公平正义的判决。

关 键 词:环境侵权  因果关系推定  案例指导

On Causality Presumption of Environmental Tort
FENG Jiaowen.On Causality Presumption of Environmental Tort[J].Journal of Wenzhou University,2012(6):65-70.
Authors:FENG Jiaowen
Institution:FENG Jiaowen(Shangyu People’s Court,Zhejiang Province,Shangyu,China 312300)
Abstract:Due to the particularity of environmental tort, it is very difficulty to find its causality by applying the traditional theory. Therefore, other countries developed doctrines of causality presumption such as doctrine of preponderance of evidence. China's current law does not provide causality presumption, and in judicial practices, the ways adopted by different places are different, but there also have been cases to which theory of causality presumption is applied creatively. In order to end the status quo that the same case has different judgments in different courts, China should give principle-based provisions for causality presumption in legislation and help the judge apply theory of causality presumption flexibly through promulgation of case guidance by the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China so as to achieve fair and just judgments in environmental tort cases.
Keywords:Environmental Tort  Causality Presumption  Case Guidance
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号