首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

学术失范的制度经济学分析
引用本文:朱家德.学术失范的制度经济学分析[J].上饶师范学院学报,2008,28(4):29-32.
作者姓名:朱家德
作者单位:华中科技大学,湖北,武汉,43007;赣南师范学院,江西,赣州,341000
摘    要:社会与学术人员之间存在委托-代理关系,由于双方信息不对称、契约的不完全性及人的有限理性.学术失范是不可避免的。学术失范是低投入、高收益的行为,并能形成“马太效应”。制度经济学的一个最鲜明的原则是制度的设计要顺应人的自利性。立足于制度经济学,解决学术失范问题,要对学术机构和学术人员设置恰当的激励和约束机制,使他们的努力与其获得的报酬相接,同时制定各种规则来约束和限制他们的失范行为。

关 键 词:学术失范  制度经济学  委托-代理  “代理问题”  “马太效应”  制度

An Analysis of Academic Misconducts by Institutional Economics
ZHU Jia-de.An Analysis of Academic Misconducts by Institutional Economics[J].Journal of Shangrao Normal College,2008,28(4):29-32.
Authors:ZHU Jia-de
Institution:ZHU Jia-de (1. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan Hubei 430074, China 2.Gannan Normal University, Ganzhou Jiangxi 341000,China)
Abstract:There exists a relationship of trustor- agent between the society and the academic personnel. There are unavoidably academic misconducts because of the information asymmetry of two parties, the incomphteness of contract and the limited rationality of human beings. Academic misconducts are behavior of low investment but high benefit, and can lead to "Matthew Effect". A most conspicuous principle of institutional economies is that the design of institution should comply with the man's serf- benefiting: In order to solve the problems of academic misconducts, it is necessary to base oneself on institutional economies, adopt appropriate meamares of encouragement and limitation to academic institutes and academic personnel, which can make their efforts match their rewards, and set up kinds of regulations to restrainand limit their academic misconducts.
Keywords:academic misconducts  institutional economics trustor-agent  "acting problem"  "Matthew Effect"  system
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号