首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

水动力学模型实时校正方法对比
引用本文:刘开磊,姚成,李致家,阚光远,包红军.水动力学模型实时校正方法对比[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2014,42(2):124-129.
作者姓名:刘开磊  姚成  李致家  阚光远  包红军
作者单位:河海大学水文水资源学院,河海大学水文水资源学院,河海大学水文水资源学院,河海大学水文水资源学院,中国气象局公共气象服务中心
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(41130639, 51179045, 41101017);公益性行业(气象)科研专项(201006037);水利部公益项目(201301068)
摘    要:选择典型的实时校正方法:传统的误差自回归、基于K最邻近算法(KNN)的非参数校正及基于Kalman滤波的多断面校正法,并以Kalman滤波与KNN结合构造综合方法,以淮河流域吴家渡—小柳巷区间作为试验河段,构建一维水动力学模型并与实时校正方法联合应用。简要介绍这4种方法的原理与模型构建方法,然后对比分析各种方法的模拟结果,尤其对模拟洪峰稳定性、峰现时间、峰现误差等进行比较,认为前3种基本方法均能在相当长的预见期内提高洪水的预报精度,而综合法实时校正法对洪峰部位的模拟更为稳定可靠、总体效果更好,更适合预报校正工作的需要。

关 键 词:水动力学模型  模型实时校正  误差自回归方法  Kalman滤波算法  K最近邻算法
收稿时间:2013/1/27 0:00:00
修稿时间:2014/3/31 0:00:00

Comparison of real-time correction methods of hydrodynamic model
LIU Kailei,YAO Cheng,LI Zhiji,KAN Guangyuan and BAO Hongjun.Comparison of real-time correction methods of hydrodynamic model[J].Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences ),2014,42(2):124-129.
Authors:LIU Kailei  YAO Cheng  LI Zhiji  KAN Guangyuan and BAO Hongjun
Institution:College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China,College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China,College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China,College of Hydrology and Water Resources, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China and CMA Public Meteorological Service Center, Beijing 100081, China
Abstract:Three typical real-time correction methods, including the traditional error autoregressive method, the nonparametric correction method based on the K-nearest neighbor(KNN), and the multi-cross section correction method based on Kalman filtering, as well as a combination of the KNN method and the Kalman filtering method were used in combination with a one-dimensional hydrodynamic model for flood forecasting and real-time correction in the Wujiadu-Xiaoliuxiang reach of the Huaihe Basin. The principles and construction methods of the four methods are briefly introduced, and a comparative analysis of their simulation results, especially of the stability of the flood peak, the time of occurrence of the flood peak, and the error of occurrence of the flood peak, is conducted. The conclusions are as follows: the three basic methods can improve the accuracy of flood forecasting over quite a long forecast period, and the combination method is more effective and reliable for flood peak simulation, and is more applicable to forecast correction.
Keywords:hydrodynamic model  real-time correction  error autoregressive model  Kalman filtering algorithm  K-nearest neighbor algorithm
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《河海大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号