| 声音骨传导方式与空气传导方式在听觉诱发脑电实验中的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王磊,张天恒,郭苗苗,张颖,杨硕,徐桂芝.声音骨传导方式与空气传导方式在听觉诱发脑电实验中的对比[J].北京理工大学学报,2019,39(S1):28-32. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王磊 张天恒 郭苗苗 张颖 杨硕 徐桂芝 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000;河北省电磁场与电器可靠性重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000,省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000;河北省电磁场与电器可靠性重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000,省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000;河北省电磁场与电器可靠性重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000,省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000;河北省电磁场与电器可靠性重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000,省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000;河北省电磁场与电器可靠性重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000,省部共建电工装备可靠性与智能化国家重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000;河北省电磁场与电器可靠性重点实验室, 河北工业大学 电气工程学院, 天津 300000 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 河北省自然科学基金资助项目（F2017202197）；河北省高等学校自然科学基金项目资助（QN2016097）；国家自然科学基金资助项目（51707054） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 声音可以通过骨传导与空气传导两种方式被人的听觉系统所感知.区别于常用的空气传导方式，骨传导方式中声音通过颅骨的振动直接刺激听觉神经，具有抗干扰、频带宽、不受中耳疾病影响等特点.本研究设计了声音两种传播方式下的听觉脑电诱发实验，从波形分析、脑电地形图以及脑网络分析三个方面入手对诱发的脑电信号进行对比分析.实验结果表明，两种方式均可诱发出P300、N200波形，且骨传导方式下，幅值显著高于空气传导方式.两种方式下的脑网络也存在显著差异.
|
| 关 键 词： | 骨传导 空气传导 N200 脑网络 |
| 收稿时间： | 2018/10/20 0:00:00 |
Comparison Experiment Study on the Auditory EEG Evoked with Bone Conduction and Air Conduction |
| |
| WANG Lei,ZHANG Tian-heng,GUO Miao-miao,ZHANG Ying,YANG Shuo and XU Gui-zhi.Comparison Experiment Study on the Auditory EEG Evoked with Bone Conduction and Air Conduction[J].Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2019,39(S1):28-32. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Lei ZHANG Tian-heng GUO Miao-miao ZHANG Ying YANG Shuo and XU Gui-zhi |
| |
| Institution: | State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300000;Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300000,State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300000;Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300000,State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300000;Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300000,State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300000;Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300000,State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300000;Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300000 and State Key Laboratory of Reliability and Intelligence of Electrical Equipment, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300000;Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Field and Electrical Apparatus Reliability of Hebei Province, School of Electrical Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300000 |
| |
| Abstract: | The human hearing system can perceive sound through two ways of bone conduction and air conduction. In the bone conduction way, the sound of the voice through the skull vibration directly stimulate the auditory nerve, with anti interference, frequency band wider, without the affection of the middle ear diseases. In this study, the auditory EEG evoked experiments were designed with air conduction and bone conduction way, and compared the results between the two methods from three aspects, waveform analysis, brain electrical activity mapping and brain network analysis. The experimental results show that the two methods can evoke P300 and N200 waveform, and the amplitude of the bone conduction method is significantly higher than that of the air conduction method. There are also significant differences between the two methods of brain network. |
| |
| Keywords: | bone conduction(BC) air conduction(AC) N200 brain network |
|
| 点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《北京理工大学学报》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
