首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板的流体力学性能
引用本文:李群生,许莉,李通,周士红,王宝华.新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板的流体力学性能[J].北京化工大学学报(自然科学版),2011,38(6):16-21.
作者姓名:李群生  许莉  李通  周士红  王宝华
作者单位:北京化工大学化学工程学院,北京,100029;北京中医药大学中药学院,北京,100029
基金项目:中国石化股份有限公司资助项目(X501021)
摘    要:在内径为Φ600mm,板间距为350mm的有机玻璃塔内,以空气-水为物系,对新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板进行冷膜实验。对3种不同开孔率的该种塔板进行流体力学性能测试,测定了不同气速和液流强度下的板压降、雾沫夹带、漏液等流体力学参数,回归得到了新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板的干板压降和湿板压降的计算公式。实验结果表明,筛孔气速在3~11m/s的范围内,新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板的干板压降和湿板压降都要低于F1型浮阀塔板。雾沫夹带随筛孔气速和液流强度的增大而增大,新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板的雾沫夹带与F1型浮阀接近,空塔气速操作上限都在2.0m/s左右。漏液随着气速的增大而减小,随着液流强度的增大而增大,新型导向圆盘形浮阀塔板的漏液要明显低于F1型浮阀塔板,空塔气速操作下限在0.53m/s左右,而F1浮阀的空塔气速操作下限在2.
关 键 词:圆型浮阀塔板  导向塔板  流体力学  开孔率
收稿时间:2011-07-04

A new flow-guided round floating valve tray and its hydromechanics
LI QunSheng,XU Li,LI Tong,ZHOU ShiHong,WANG BaoHua.A new flow-guided round floating valve tray and its hydromechanics[J].Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology,2011,38(6):16-21.
Authors:LI QunSheng  XU Li  LI Tong  ZHOU ShiHong  WANG BaoHua
Institution:1.College of Chemical Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029; 2.School of Chinese Materia Medica, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China
Abstract:A cold-flow model experiment with a new flow-guided round floating valve tray has been conducted in a Φ600mm Perspex column with an air-water system. Three trays with different hole area ratios were studied. Hydromechanical parameters such as tray pressure drop, entrainment and weeping of trays were measured and the regression model of the dry plate pressure drop and wet plate pressure drop were obtained. According to the results, the tray pressure drop of the experimental tray was significantly lower than for an F1 floating valve tray with sieve pit gas velocity in the range 3-11m/s. The entrainment of the experimental tray increased with sieve pit gas velocity and liquid flow rate, and was close to the value for F1 floating valve trays. The upper limit of the gas velocity was 2.0m/s. The weeping rate of the experimental tray increased with liquid flow rate, and there was a negative relationship between weeping rate and sieve pit gas velocity. It was also found that the weeping rate of the experimental tray was significantly lower than that of the F1 floating valve tray. The lower limit of the gas velocity was 0.53m/s, whereas the value for the F1 floating valve tray under the same conditions was 2.6m/s.
Keywords:round floating valve tray  flow-guided tray  hydromechanics  hole area ratio  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《北京化工大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京化工大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号