首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

无律则一元论与随附性论题——戴维森论心物关系
引用本文:郁锋.无律则一元论与随附性论题——戴维森论心物关系[J].自然辩证法研究,2006,22(10):42-45,62.
作者姓名:郁锋
作者单位:北京师范大学,哲学与社会学学院,北京,100875
摘    要:70年代,戴维森提出在“无律则一元论”的纲领下解决心物关系问题,同时还借用了随附性来描绘他的这种非还原物理主义的心物图景。这一学说遭到了金在权等还原论者的强烈批评。戴维森关于“事件本体论”、“随附性”的形而上学预设为其心物关系说提供了严密的哲学依据,然而其深刻的片面性也决定了他的心物关系说仍存有进一步辩护的需要。

关 键 词:无律则一元论  随附性  非还原物理主义  事件本体论
文章编号:1000-8934(2006)10-0042-04
收稿时间:2006-04-28
修稿时间:2006-04-28

Anomalous Monism and Supervenience Thesis: Davidson on Relation between the Mental and the Physical
YU Feng.Anomalous Monism and Supervenience Thesis: Davidson on Relation between the Mental and the Physical[J].Studies In Dialectics of Nature,2006,22(10):42-45,62.
Authors:YU Feng
Institution:Philosophy and Sociology College, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract:In 1970s,Donald Davidson solved the problem of the relational between the mental and the physical under anomalous monism.At the same time,he invoked the notion of supervenience to describe the picture of the mental and the physical,which shown the characteristic of nonreductive physicalism.This theory was strongly criticized by the reductionists like Jaegwon Kim.Davidson's metaphysical presuppositions about "the ontology of event" and "the concept of supervenience" provided the exactly philosophical proof for his theory.However,because above metaphysical presuppositions were profound but incomplete,thus Davidson's theory remained the need to be more justified.
Keywords:anomalous monism  supervenience  nonreductive physicalism  the ontology of event
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号