| 结构实在论评析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王巍. 结构实在论评析[J]. 自然辩证法研究, 2006, 22(11): 34-38,48 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王巍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学科技与社会研究中心,北京,100084 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 曹天予提出的结构实在论知识论版本在科学哲学界有很大影响，并引发了《综合》期刊专刊讨论。他既批评反实在论的观点，也对结构实在论的知识版本与本体版本有所批判。他从结构、本体、建构这三个概念出发，论证了科学理论的客观性体现为建构性、历史性、整体性、修正性、革命性。本文对曹天予的结构实在论进行了系统的梳理与分析。笔者赞同他对“不充分决定”论旨的批评，对他批评“本体论不连续性”持中立态度，但对他的“普遍语法论证”有所存疑。
|
| 关 键 词： | 结构实在论 结构 本体 建构 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8934（2006）10-0034-05 |
| 收稿时间： | 2006-05-31 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-05-31 |
A Critical Analysis of Structural Realism |
| |
| WANG Wei. A Critical Analysis of Structural Realism[J]. Studies In Dialectics of Nature, 2006, 22(11): 34-38,48 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Wei |
| |
| Affiliation: | Institute of Science, Technology and Society, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084,China |
| |
| Abstract: | The epistemological version of structural realism,raised by prof.CAO Tian Yu,has great influence in philosophy of science.Syntheses had a special volume to discuss the topic.Cao criticizes anti-realism,as well as the epistemic version and the ontic version of structural realism.From the concepts of structure,ontology,and construct,he analyzes the objectivity of scientific theories into five aspects: construction,historicity,holism,revision,and revolution.The paper gives a systematic analysis and comment of his philosophy.The author agrees with his criticism of under-determination thesis,is neutral to his argument against ontological discontinuity,but questions his universal language argument. |
| |
| Keywords: | structural realism structure ontology construction |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
