How not to integrate the history and philosophy of science: a reply to Chalmers |
| |
Authors: | William R Newman |
| |
Institution: | Department of History and Philosophy of Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Alan Chalmers uses Robert Boyle’s mechanical philosophy as an example of the irrelevance of ‘philosophy’ to ‘science’ and criticizes my 2006 book Atoms and alchemy for overemphasizing Boyle’s successes. The present paper responds as follows: first, it argues that Chalmers employs an overly simplistic methodology insensitive to the distinction between historical and philosophical claims; second, it shows that the central theses of Atoms and alchemy are untouched by Chalmers’s criticisms; and third, it uses Boyle’s analysis of subordinate causes and his debate with Henry More in the 1670s to demonstrate the inadequacy of Chalmers’s construal of the mechanical philosophy. |
| |
Keywords: | Robert Boyle Alan Chalmers Geber Paul of Taranto Daniel Sennert Alchemy Chymistry Mechanical philosophy Reduction to the pristine state |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|