| 制度性减排的路径选择 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘松.制度性减排的路径选择[J].科学管理研究,2012,30(4):35-39. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘松 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 鄂尔多斯职业学院,内蒙古鄂尔多斯 017000;中央民族大学,北京 100081 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 内蒙古自治区科学技术计划项目(20110602) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 多年来,我国依循行政管制路径推进"节能减排",取得显著成效的同时也存在一些问题。进入"十二五"时期,碳减排已成为我国实现可持续发展目标的长期制度性任务,探索更具经济效率的市场化减排道路成为必然。以此为背景,对制度性减排的行政管制路径与市场路径开展比较研究,侧重分析碳税与碳排放权交易两种市场机制,对比分析配额交易与基准线交易两种不同形式。
|
| 关 键 词： | 碳减排 制度路径 碳税 碳排放权交易 |
Alternative Systematic Approaches toward Carbon Emissions Abatement |
| |
| LIU Song.Alternative Systematic Approaches toward Carbon Emissions Abatement[J].Scientific Management Research,2012,30(4):35-39. |
| |
| Authors: | LIU Song |
| |
| Institution: | LIU Song1,2(Ordos Vocational College,Inner Mongolia Ordos 017000,China; Minzu University of China,Beijing 100081,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | China needs efficient and effective systematic approaches,other than "Command and Control",toward its ambitious target to cut Carbon Emissions per unit of GDP by 40%～45% by 2020,compared with 2005.Introduced with its 12th "Five-year Plan",pilot projects for carbon emissions abatement,based upon carbon tax as well as upon carbon emissions trading,are being launched since 2013,heralding an upcoming move toward market-based approaches.This paper thereby pursues a comparison study on "command and control" versus market-based approaches,detailing the mechanisms of carbon tax,"cap and trade",and "baseline and credit". |
| |
| Keywords: | Carbon Emissions Abatement Systematic Approach Carbon Tax Carbon Emissions Trading |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
