实行区域拥挤费征收的交通系统与居住地选择之间的关系

为了探讨区域拥挤征收对居民居住地和交通方式选择的影响，建立对各小区居住地进行满意度评估模型，结合家庭收入和房价，构造家庭消费剩余模型. 通过对路网实行区域拥挤征收政策，根据家庭每个成员不同出行目的的旅行链特征和相应的出行方式，得到家庭的通勤广义交通阻抗和节假日娱乐出行的广义交通阻抗，利用消费剩余模型，获得家庭剩余最大的居住地. 例证表明：区域拥挤征收政策不影响低收入移动家庭居住地选择；征收水平较低时不影响高收入移动家庭居住地选择，征收水平较高时高收入家庭由郊区向征收区域边界移动，征收水平很高时又无影响；在工作日和节假日，区域征收水平都存在一个最佳的征收点，且节假日最佳的征收点比工作日的最佳征收点高，实行最佳征收点征收，有利于经济效益和社会效用发挥到最大.

Relationship between residential choice and transport system of area-road congestion charging scheme

In order to explore impact of the area-road congestion charging about the residents' residential location and transportation modes, the satisfaction assessment model was proposed to assess the residential location, and the household consumption remaining model was established by the satisfaction, household income and house prices. Area-road congestion charging regimes were implemented, and the generalized commuting traffic impedance and generalized holiday entertainment traffic impedance were got by different trip purpose travel chain characteristics and the corresponding travel mode of family members. The residence of the largest family remaining was got by the household consumption remaining model. The results indicate that area-road congestion charging regimes don't affect low-income mobile home residential choice. A lower level congestion charging does not affect high-income mobile home residential choice, and a higher levels congestion charging makes high-income families mobile home residential from the suburbs to charging regional-border, and it has no affect when the charging level is high. On weekdays and holidays, there is an optimum point both the regional congestion charging level, and the holidays charging optimum point is higher, so it is conducive to maximize for economic efficiency and social utility when the best charging point is implemented.