首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

权利行使的界限与敲诈勒索犯罪关系研究
引用本文:陈咏梅.权利行使的界限与敲诈勒索犯罪关系研究[J].南阳理工学院学报,2010,2(3):69-72.
作者姓名:陈咏梅
作者单位:黄淮学院社会科学系,河南,驻马店,463000
摘    要:敲诈勒索罪虽系常见性、多发性犯罪,但由于行为人犯罪目的及手段的多样性、复杂性,以致本罪在司法认定中疑难重重,刑法理论上也众说纷纭、莫衷一是。文章以所有权人、债权人、消费者、信访人等行使权利内容的不同为切入点,从不同的层面,分析论证了敲诈勒索犯罪与正当行使权利的界限,并从理论上予以概括总结,厘清了两者的关系,有利于司法实务中正确地区分敲诈勒索犯罪与行使正当权利的界限。

关 键 词:权利行使  敲诈勒索罪  司法认定

RESEARCH OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLACKMAIL CRIME AND EXERCISING THE RIGHT
CHEN Yong-mei.RESEARCH OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BLACKMAIL CRIME AND EXERCISING THE RIGHT[J].Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology,2010,2(3):69-72.
Authors:CHEN Yong-mei
Institution:CHEN Yong-mei (Department of social science,Huang-huai University,Henan Zhu ma dian 463000)
Abstract:Although extortion is a common crime in judicial practice,because of the perpetrator's criminal purpose and means’s diversity and complexity,this crime is difficult to justify in the administration.Articles analysis the bound between the extortion crime and legitimate right from different levels of owners,creditors,consumers,and other petitioners’s rights,and theoretically summarize,clarify the relationship between the extortion crime and legitimate exercise of the right.The conclusion is beneficial to distinguish the judicial practice of extortion crime and the limits of the exercise of legitimate rights correctly.
Keywords:The right to exercise  Extortion  Judicial adoption
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号