Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking |
| |
Authors: | Piotr Błaszczyk Mikhail G. Katz David Sherry |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institute of Mathematics, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland 2. Department of Mathematics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel 3. Department of Philosophy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | The widespread idea that infinitesimals were “eliminated” by the “great triumvirate” of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d’Alembert, Cauchy, and others. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|