首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Ten Misconceptions from the History of Analysis and Their Debunking
Authors:Piotr Błaszczyk  Mikhail G. Katz  David Sherry
Affiliation:1. Institute of Mathematics, Pedagogical University of Cracow, Kraków, Poland
2. Department of Mathematics, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, 52900, Israel
3. Department of Philosophy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, 86011, USA
Abstract:The widespread idea that infinitesimals were “eliminated” by the “great triumvirate” of Cantor, Dedekind, and Weierstrass is refuted by an uninterrupted chain of work on infinitesimal-enriched number systems. The elimination claim is an oversimplification created by triumvirate followers, who tend to view the history of analysis as a pre-ordained march toward the radiant future of Weierstrassian epsilontics. In the present text, we document distortions of the history of analysis stemming from the triumvirate ideology of ontological minimalism, which identified the continuum with a single number system. Such anachronistic distortions characterize the received interpretation of Stevin, Leibniz, d’Alembert, Cauchy, and others.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号