首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

质疑“证据之王”
引用本文:范远鸿.质疑“证据之王”[J].重庆三峡学院学报,2001(Z1).
作者姓名:范远鸿
作者单位:重庆三峡学院社科系 重庆万州404000
摘    要:证据证明力的大小是刑事诉讼中一个最敏感的话题。通过对几种所谓“证据之王”的比较分析,不难看出任何证据的证明力都是相对的,片面强调和相信所谓证据之王必将犯形而上学的错误,并违背“以事实为依据,以法律为准绳”的法制总原则,在司法实践中会造成不可估量的损失。

关 键 词:证据之王  证明力

Oppugning "the King Proof
FUAN Yuan-hong.Oppugning "the King Proof[J].JOurnal of Chongqing Three Gorges University,2001(Z1).
Authors:FUAN Yuan-hong
Abstract:The most sensitive topic among criminal procedure is the validity of the evidence. Through contrasting and analyzing several so-called "the King proof," the author points out in this article that the validity of any evidence is relative . Over-emphasis or trust will inevitably lead to metaphysics and breach of the general legal principle : "Basing on the facts and abiding by the law ". It can even cause inestimable loses in the judicial practices .
Keywords:the King proof  validity  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号