首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

面板数据空间误差分量模型的空间相关性检验
引用本文:龙志和,陈青青,林光平.面板数据空间误差分量模型的空间相关性检验[J].系统工程理论与实践,2013,33(1):72-81.
作者姓名:龙志和  陈青青  林光平
作者单位:1. 华南理工大学 经济与贸易学院, 广州 510006; 2. 波特兰州立大学 经济系, 波特兰 97207
摘    要:将截面误差分量模型(spatial error components, SEC)扩展至面板数据, 推导其联合检验、边际检验及条件检验, 并通过Monte Carlo模拟实验证明: 当随机效应存在时, 条件检验更为有效; 当随机效应不存在时, 边际检验更为有效; 空间权重矩阵的选取与随机效应是否存在相关, 但未标准化的空间权重矩阵更适合检验空间相关性; 此外, 更大的N或T使得检验更为有效. 研究同时发现, 当真实数据生成过程为面板数据SEC模型时, 传统空间经济计量模型中的Moran I、LM-Error及LM-Lag检验均失效.

关 键 词:误差分量模型  面板数据  LM检验  Monte  Carlo模拟  
收稿时间:2010-09-06

Spatial correlation tests of panel data spatial error components model
LONG Zhi-he , CHEN Qing-qing , LIN Guang-ping.Spatial correlation tests of panel data spatial error components model[J].Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice,2013,33(1):72-81.
Authors:LONG Zhi-he  CHEN Qing-qing  LIN Guang-ping
Institution:1. School of Economic and Commerce, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China; 2. Economic Department, Portland State University, Portland 97207, USA
Abstract:This paper extends cross section spatial error components (SEC) models to panel data, we derivate joint tests, marginal tests and conditional tests, and using Monte Carlo simulation experiments, we prove that, when random effect (RE) exists, conditional tests are more effective, while RE does not exists, marginal tests are more effective; the choice of spatial weight matrix is related with whether RE exists, but non-standard weight matrix is more suitable; what's more, greater N or T will make tests more effective. At the same time, we find that when the real data garnering process is panel data SEC model, traditional spatial tests as Moran I, LM-Error and LM-Lag have poor performance.
Keywords:spatial error components model  panel data  LM test  Monte Carlo simulation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号