首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

狂欢化诗学与逍遥游思想再比较
引用本文:任真,;何志钧.狂欢化诗学与逍遥游思想再比较[J].温州大学学报(自然科学版),2008(1):52-57.
作者姓名:任真  ;何志钧
作者单位:[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064; [2]鲁东大学汉语言文学院,山东烟台264025
摘    要:巴赫金的“狂欢化”诗学和庄子“逍遥游”思想,在对待程式化、定型化真理的态度上,对待世俗人生及其生存方式的态度上,有着不同的精神内涵和文化取向。社会文化语境造就了二者不同的理论品格。但在对所谓正统的、定型化的真理的否定取向上,二者又有一些相似之处。在巴赫金的理论中,这种否定取向叛逆性地表现为对民间笑谑文化的关注与认可。而在庄子的理论中,它则表现为无所肯定、无所“作为”,同时又入世顺物的“逍遥游”态度。

关 键 词:狂欢  逍遥  笑谑  否定  真理  世俗

On Bakhtin's "Carnival" Theory and Zhuangzi's Thought of "Going Rambling"
Institution:REN Zhen, HE Zhijun (1. Chinese Literature and Journalism College, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China 610064; 2. Chinese Language and Literature College, Ludong University, Yantai, China 264025)
Abstract:The Bakhtin's theory on "carnival" and Zhuangzi's thought of "going rambling" are different in both their attitudes in trading formalized norms and worldly living ways, and the cultural and spiritual angles. This difference, on the one hand, comes form the different cultural backgrounds and social contexts of the east and the west. On the other hand, both of them emphasize the negation to the official formalized norms and values. To Bakhtin, this negation lies traitorously in the concentrating to the folk culture of laughter; and to Zhuangzi, it lies in the attitude of "going rambling without destination" which either affirms and builds nothing or follows everything in the living world.
Keywords:Carnival  Going rambling  Laughter  Negation  Norms  World
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号