首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

基于DEA的决策单元排序方法研究
引用本文:邢会歌,王卓甫,尹红莲,.基于DEA的决策单元排序方法研究[J].系统工程与电子技术,2009,31(11):2648-2651.
作者姓名:邢会歌  王卓甫  尹红莲  
作者单位:1. 河海大学工程管理研究所, 江苏 南京 210098; 2. 山东水利职业学院, 山东 日照 276826
摘    要:针对DEA方法中交叉评价模型在决策单元的评价排序问题上存在的不足--实现完全排序需要进行多次交叉评价,分析了引入差额指标模型的排序机制,该模型得出的评价排序结果较为完整。在此基础上,提出了新的DEA排序模型--综合输入效率模型,给出了具体的评价步骤,可实现与差额指标模型同样的排序功能。进一步通过数值分析对三种不同评价排序模型的排序效果进行对比分析,结论为差额指标与综合输入效率模型在评价排序时更为有效。

关 键 词:多属性决策  排序  数据包络分析方法  交叉评价机制  差额指标  综合输入效率

Methods of ranking decision making units based on DEA
XING Hui-ge,WANG Zhuo-fu,YIN Hong-lian.Methods of ranking decision making units based on DEA[J].System Engineering and Electronics,2009,31(11):2648-2651.
Authors:XING Hui-ge  WANG Zhuo-fu  YIN Hong-lian
Institution:1. Inst. of Engineering Management, Hohai Univ., Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Shandong Water Polytechnic, Rizhao 276826, China
Abstract:In view of the insufficiency of cross evaluation model of DEA methods on the ranking of decision making units that multiple evaluation processes are needed for completely ranking, a ranking mechanism with the balance index model is analyzed, and concluded that the ranking result is more complete with this model hay-ing been used. Based on these a new DEA ranking model, the comprehensive input efficiency model, is put for-ward, and the specific evaluation procedures are given, which can achieve the same ranking function as the balance index model. Furthermore, a comparative analysis of three models is carried out through numerical analysis, and the conclusion is that the balance index model and the comprehensive input efficiency model are more efficient and reasonable.
Keywords:multi-attribute decision making  ranking  DEA method  cross evaluation mechanism  balance index  comprehensive input efficiency
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《系统工程与电子技术》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《系统工程与电子技术》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号