| 关于唯物史观研究的两个“盲区” |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王丽琦,刘宝杰,李学芝.关于唯物史观研究的两个“盲区”[J].沈阳大学学报,2009,21(2):63-66. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王丽琦 刘宝杰 李学芝 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 华侨大学,人文与公共管理学院,福建,泉州,362021
2. 临沂师范学院,环境与旅游学院,山东,临沂,276005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 分析了学界近十年在唯物史观这一领域内对原著文本的探究中存在的两个“盲区”：一是对恩格斯独著文本的“忽视”；二是对马克思中后期文本的“忽视”。指出唯物史观的倪现、嬗变是随着马克思、恩格斯对欧洲革命，尤其是对英、法、德三国在社会发展中生产方式变革的深刻分析而渐渐成熟的革命性理论体系。认为对《英国工人阶级状况》（1848年至1850年的法兰西阶级斗争》《德国的革命与反革命》和《路易·波拿巴的雾月十八日》等文本的探究尤为必要。
|
| 关 键 词： | 唯物史观 英国工人阶级状况 法兰西阶级斗争 生产方式 |
On Two "Blind Spots" of Historical Materialism Research |
| |
| WANG Liqi,LIU Baojie,LI Xuezhi.On Two "Blind Spots" of Historical Materialism Research[J].Journal of Shenyang University,2009,21(2):63-66. |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Liqi LIU Baojie LI Xuezhi |
| |
| Institution: | 1. College of Humanities and Public Administration, Huaqiao University, Quanzhou 362021, China; 2. College of Environment and Tourism, Linyi Normal College, Linyi 276005, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The two ＂blind spots＂ in the field of historical materialism research of the scholars to the original text in the last decade are analyzed. One spot is of ignoring the text of Engels himself, the other is of overlooking the part of latter text of Marx. It is pointed out that the historical materialism comes out and evolution along with the development of Marx and Engels on the European revolution, especially the social development and the profound changes in production methods in Britain, France and Germany, and becomes a revolutionary theoretical system gradually. The exploring of ＂Status of the British Working Class＂, ＂French Class Struggle from 1848 to 1850＂, ＂German Revolution and Counter-revolutionary＂, ＂Louis？ Bonaparte＇s 18th of the Fog Month＂, etc. , is very necessary. |
| |
| Keywords: | historical materialism State of British working class French class struggle Production |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
