| 多属性决策的TOPSIS夹角度量评价法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘树林,邱菀华. 多属性决策的TOPSIS夹角度量评价法[J]. 系统工程理论与实践, 1996, 16(7): 12-16. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(1996)7-12 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘树林 邱菀华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京航空航天大学管理学院 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 推广了决策矩阵的几种规范化方法及与此相应的理想和负（反）理想解（点）的确定法。简化了新双基点法所用的与理想点的贴近度。利用被评价方案与理想解和负理想解的夹角，定义了一种新的与理想解的贴近度，据此给出了一种新的综合排序法，并将此法与ＴＯＰＳＩＳ法做了对比，得到了好结果.
|
| 关 键 词： | 多属性决策 理想解（点） 负（反）理想解（点） 相对帖近度 TOPSIS法 |
| 收稿时间： | 1995-04-11 |
The TOPSIS Angle Measure Evaluation Method for MADM |
| |
| Liu Shulin Qiu Wanhua. The TOPSIS Angle Measure Evaluation Method for MADM[J]. Systems Engineering —Theory & Practice, 1996, 16(7): 12-16. DOI: 10.12011/1000-6788(1996)7-12 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Shulin Qiu Wanhua |
| |
| Affiliation: | Management School, Beijing University of Aeronautics & Astronautics, 100083 |
| |
| Abstract: | The method for normalizing decision matrix and determing the corresponding ideal and negative-ideal solutions (points) is generalized. The relative closeness to the ideal point for the New Double Basic Points Method is simplified. By using the angles between an alternative (which will be evaluated) and the ideal solution and between the alternative and the negative-ideal solution,we define a new relative closeness to the ideal solutions; and according to it we develop a new synthetical evaluation method. Finally, we obtain good results by comparing this method with TOSIS method. |
| |
| Keywords: | multiple attribute decision making ideal solution (point) negative-ideal solution (point) relative closeness TOPSIS method |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《系统工程理论与实践》下载全文 |
