| 静、动态试验评价混凝剂作用效果的对比 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 程海鹰,张洁,冯文强.静、动态试验评价混凝剂作用效果的对比[J].西安石油大学学报(自然科学版),2003,18(2):50-53. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 程海鹰 张洁 冯文强 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西安石油学院,石油化工系,陕西,西安,710065 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对硫酸铝、聚合铝 (PAC)、聚合铁 (PFS)和部分水解聚丙烯酰胺 (HPAM)等 4种混凝剂处理模拟污水的效果分别进行了静态烧杯试验和动态模拟试验评价 .结果表明 :动态试验评价方法确定的污水浊度降低率和混凝剂的最佳投放量分别为静态试验评价方法所确定结果的 80 %～ 85 %和1 .5～ 2 .0倍 ;评价结果差异的根本原因在于试验过程中反应器类型和水动力学条件不同 ;用动态试验模拟混凝过程是可行的
|
| 关 键 词： | 水处理 混凝剂 烧杯试验 动态模拟试验 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5361(2003)02-0050-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2002年10月14 |
Comparison of Effects of Coagulant Evaluated by Static Test and Dynamic Test |
| |
| CHENG Hai-ying,ZHANG Jie,FENG Wen-qiang.Comparison of Effects of Coagulant Evaluated by Static Test and Dynamic Test[J].Journal of Xian Shiyou University,2003,18(2):50-53. |
| |
| Authors: | CHENG Hai-ying ZHANG Jie FENG Wen-qiang |
| |
| Abstract: | By means of static beaker test and dynamic simulation test, the effects of Al 2(SO 4) 3, PAC, PHS and HPAM of treating simulated wastewater are evaluated. The results show that the reduced ratio of turbidity determined by dynamic test is about 80%~85% of that determined by static test static beaker test, and the optimum dosages of these coagulants determined by dynamic test are 1.5~2.0 times of those determined by static test; the difference between two test results is due to different reactor type and hydrodynamic condition; simulating coagulation process by dynamic test is practicable. |
| |
| Keywords: | wastewater treatment coagulant beaker test dynamic simulation test |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
