| 范·弗拉森"语用学"科学说明观的两个问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 毕文胜.范·弗拉森"语用学"科学说明观的两个问题[J].自然辩证法研究,2005,21(10):30-33. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 毕文胜 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 厦门大学,哲学系,福建,厦门,316005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 范·弗拉森的科学说明理论("语用学"的科学说明)以语境为基础,以经验论的实用主义为背景,综合了以前说明模式的成果,以相对完美的形式取得了学术界比较一致的承认.但事情的另一面是,范·弗拉森"语用学"的科学说明理论存在两个问题:一是他的科学说明理论语用学性质模糊;二是他的相关关系的不相关性.
|
| 关 键 词： | 科学说明 语用学 相关关系 |
| 文章编号： | 1000-8934(2005)10-0030-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年5月31日 |
Two Problems of Bas C. van Fraassen's Pragmatics Theory of Scientific Explanation |
| |
| BI Wen-sheng.Two Problems of Bas C. van Fraassen''''s Pragmatics Theory of Scientific Explanation[J].Studies In Dialectics of Nature,2005,21(10):30-33. |
| |
| Authors: | BI Wen-sheng |
| |
| Abstract: | The Model of van Fraassen's scientific explanation is the currently satisfactory explanatory theory,which,based on the context,taking the pragmatism of the empiricism as the background,synthesizing the result of the model before and absorbing their advantage dialectically,has being obtained more consistent acknowledgement of the academic circles with the perfect form.But on the other hand,in writer's eyes,van Fraassen's theory exist two problems: one is property faintness in pragmatics theory of his scientific explanation;the other is his related relation not relativity.Mistaking and criticizing to the classic model of Hempel's scientific explanation cause two problems |
| |
| Keywords: | scientific explanation pragmatics related relation |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
