鄙倍荒唐,殆同戏剧：《晏子春秋》史文辨

在中国古代文学史上,＂崇史尚实＂的主流观点使《晏子春秋》之类以历史为基础却又不拘泥于历史的作品被鄙弃,难以得到恰当的评判。随着＂文＂的地位的提高,文学批评的完善,＂史＂与＂文＂始平分秋色。虽然《晏子春秋》处于中国文学发展的萌芽期,具有复杂的创作特征,但其具有的与史书迥异的文学创作的特征和手法,已显示出《晏子春秋》叛离正史、走向文学的的鲜明倾向。

On Yanzi's Spring and Autum Annals

In the history of ancient literature in China,works based,but not limited,on history,such as Yanzi s Spring and Autum Annals,were not evaluated properly.With the rising status of literature and the development of literary criticism,the positions of history and literature were balanced.Although the creation of Yanzi s Spring and Autum Annals has complicated background and characteristics,it shows a clear tendency to become more close to literature.