首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

数字货币交易所洗钱行为检测
引用本文:钟增胜,朱纯瑶,杨逸飞,廖忻橙,王任之,赵颖 ?,周芳芳,施荣华,秦拯.数字货币交易所洗钱行为检测[J].湖南大学学报(自然科学版),2022,49(10):119-129.
作者姓名:钟增胜  朱纯瑶  杨逸飞  廖忻橙  王任之  赵颖 ?  周芳芳  施荣华  秦拯
作者单位:(1.中南大学 计算机学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2.重庆工商大学 人工智能学院,重庆 400067;3.湖南大学 信息科学与工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082)
摘    要:数字货币交易中的洗钱行为区别于传统金融犯罪形态,传统反洗钱技术手段难以直接适用. 针对数字货币交易所面对的洗钱行为检测需求和检测难点,通过定义交易行为,构建了一个层次化加权的交易行为特征描述体系,提出了一个结合孤立点检测和小类簇检测的数字货币交易行为异常检测方法,实现从交易行为到交易用户的洗钱可疑程度的量化度量. 在真实数字货币交易所数据集上进行评估实验,结果显示,异常交易行为、可疑洗钱用户、显著性异常交易行为和隐蔽性异常交易行为的检测准确率分别为96.02%、95.05%、95.83%和95.81%,均优于基准算法. 同时,本文算法的特征体系能对检测结果做出有效解释,帮助数字货币交易所安全员快速开展后续调查和取证工作.

关 键 词:数字货币  异常检测  反洗钱  孤立点检测

Money Laundering Detection for Cryptocurrency Transactions
ZHONG Zengsheng,ZHU Chunyao,YANG Yifei,LIAO Xincheng,WANG Renzhi,ZHAO Ying?,ZHOU Fangfang,SHI Ronghu,QIN Zheng.Money Laundering Detection for Cryptocurrency Transactions[J].Journal of Hunan University(Naturnal Science),2022,49(10):119-129.
Authors:ZHONG Zengsheng  ZHU Chunyao  YANG Yifei  LIAO Xincheng  WANG Renzhi  ZHAO Ying?  ZHOU Fangfang  SHI Ronghu  QIN Zheng
Abstract:Money laundering in cryptocurrency transactions is differentiated from traditional financial crimes due to its strong anonymity and decentralization. The existing anti-money laundering techniques cannot be directly applied to cryptocurrency transactions. Considering the traceability, interpretability, and measurability of money laundering crime forensics, this paper designs a four-stage money laundering detection approach: (1) defining a set of transactions of a user in a period as a transaction behavior; (2) constructing a set of features to characterize transaction behaviors; (3) adopting outlier detection and small cluster detection methods to find out loud and subtle anomalous transactions; (4) analyzing the suspicious score distributions of users and calculating a suspected-launderer value for each of them. To evaluate the performance of our proposed method, a real-world money laundering dataset is obtained and experimentally evaluated. The experiment results show that our approach obtains 96.02%, 95.05%, 95.83%, and 95.81% accuracy in terms of abnormal transaction behaviors, suspected money launderers, loud abnormal transactions, and subtle abnormal transactions, respectively, all better than benchmark algorithms. Moreover, the carefully-designed features of transaction behaviors can offer supportive interpretations for the detection results and help exchange security officers to carry on further investigations and crime forensics.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号