首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

论精神损害赔偿——兼评《侵权责任法》第22条
引用本文:袁丽红.论精神损害赔偿——兼评《侵权责任法》第22条[J].新余高专学报,2011,16(4):24-26.
作者姓名:袁丽红
作者单位:东莞市广播电视大学,广东东莞,523001
摘    要:精神损害赔偿已成为现代社会对公民人身权受到损害的一项重要救济方法,《侵权责任法》第22条也已吸纳了精神损害赔偿制,而该条存在主体适用范围过窄、客体仅限于"人身利益",排除了财产权、只能在侵权之诉中适用、"严重精神损害"规定欠妥等问题。我们应该增加法人和其他组织为请求权的主体,同时将客体增加"人格物"、将精神损害赔偿的请求权基础从侵权责任扩张到违约责任、完善"严重精神损害"的解释。

关 键 词:精神损害  人身利益  人格物  侵权责任

On spiritual damage compensation——also comment on Clause 22 of Tort Liability Law
YUAN Li-hong.On spiritual damage compensation——also comment on Clause 22 of Tort Liability Law[J].Journal of XinYu College,2011,16(4):24-26.
Authors:YUAN Li-hong
Institution:YUAN Li-hong (Dongguan Open University,Dongguang 523001 China)
Abstract:the spiritual damage compensation has become an important relief for the citizens whose personal rights are damaged in the modern society.Clause 22 of Tort Liability Law adopts the spiritual damage compensation system,but is has some drawbacks,such as narrow application scope of subject,object only limited to personal right,excluding property,only suitable for torts,incorrect definition of serious spiritual damage,etc.We should add corporation and other organizations as the subjects of claim right and personality object to the object,expand tort liability to violation liability on the basis of claim right of spiritual damage compensation and perfect the interpretation of serious spiritual damage.
Keywords:spiritual damage  personal interest  personality object  tort liability
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号