公司董事勤勉义务和裁判标准适用研究

我国《公司法》对董事勤勉义务的规定略显粗糙，导致司法适用出现混乱情况。通过比较英美法上的“适中标准”、德国法上的“专家标准”、日本法上的“善良管理人标准”，以及分析司法实践中法官对于该问题的判决，英美法上的“适中标准”适合我国国情。此外，法院判决必须考虑如下因素：董事在公司中的地位，公司经营的行业或公司的规模；公司的经营状况等。

Research on the Director ’s Duty of Diligence and Judicial Standard

The Company Law of the People＇s Republic of China on the director＇s duty of diligence is not specific enough, thus, it caused some confusion in the judicial application. The paper compared the moderate standards in Common Law, the expert standards in German law, kindhearted administrator standard in Japanese law and the judgment in the judicial practice. It found that the moderate standards in Common Law is suitable for China’s situation. In addition, the court must take the following factors into consideration： the directors＇ position in the company, the industry and scale of company; operating condition of company, etc.