| “托”出价下几种拍卖方式比较研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈,胜,利.“托”出价下几种拍卖方式比较研究[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2012,46(3):261-266. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈 胜 利 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西安财经学院管理学院,西安,710100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 针对现有网上不同拍卖方式下"托"投标理论研究的不足,运用决策分析和博弈论的基本理论和方法分别研究了英国式拍卖、首价密封拍卖和次价密封拍卖方式下投标者的最优投标策略,并在此基础上对"托"投标下3种拍卖方式中投标者的期望收益和卖者的期望收益损失与投标者估价分布、"托"投标的概率以及投标人数之间的关系进行了比较分析,得出一些建设性的结论并解释一些现象.
|
| 关 键 词： | “托”投标 英国式拍卖 首价密封拍卖 次价密封拍卖 |
A comparative analysis of several auction types with "Shill" bidding |
| |
| CHEN Shengli.A comparative analysis of several auction types with "Shill" bidding[J].Journal of Central China Normal University(Natural Sciences),2012,46(3):261-266. |
| |
| Authors: | CHEN Shengli |
| |
| Institution: | CHEN Shengli(School of Management,Xi’an University of Finance and Economics,Xi’an 710100) |
| |
| Abstract: | Aiming at the disadvantage of current research of shill bidding with different online auctions types,a this paper,applying decision analysis method and game theory,firstly,a researches the bidder’s optimal biding strategy of English auction,first-price sealed-bid auction and second-price sealed-bid auction with shill bidding,respectively.Secondly,it uses bidder’s expected gain and seller’s revenue as a basis to compare these three important auctions types,and then interprets some bidding behaviors in practice. |
| |
| Keywords: | "Shill" bidding English auction first-price sealed-bid auction second-price sealed-bid auction |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《华中师范大学学报(自然科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
