| Sramek公式及修正式计算每搏量与导纳法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘志达,张淑芳.Sramek公式及修正式计算每搏量与导纳法的比较[J].燕山大学学报,1987(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘志达 张淑芳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 大连医学院物理教研室，大连水产学院数学教研室 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 本文应用阻抗—导纳式心输出量机对40名正常成年人(男、女各半)进行每搏量(SV)的测定,并把Sramek公式及Sramek修正式和导纳法3种不同方法测得的SV进行比较。结果表明,应用Sramek公式和Sramek修正式测得的SV均大于标准对照值,而导纳法的SV值在标准对照值范围内。提示导纳法测得的SV值可能更为可靠。
|
| 关 键 词： | 每搏量 阻抗法 导纳法 |
The Comparison of the Methods on Calculating Stroke Volume by the Methods of Electrical Admittance Plethysmogram and Sramek's Fomula and its Revised form |
| |
| Pan Zhida,Zhang Shufon.The Comparison of the Methods on Calculating Stroke Volume by the Methods of Electrical Admittance Plethysmogram and Sramek''''s Fomula and its Revised form[J].Journal of Yanshan University,1987(2). |
| |
| Authors: | Pan Zhida Zhang Shufon |
| |
| Institution: | Pan Zhida,Zhang Shufon Department of Physics,Dalian Medical College Department of Mathematics,Dalian Fisheries College |
| |
| Abstract: | This paper describes that we measure the stroke volume (SV) values of 40 normal people (20 males, 20 females) with the impedance/admittance cardiac output (CO) device, and compare the SV values measured by the three different methods. The methods are EAP, Sramek formula and its revised form. The result indicates that both of the SV values measured by Sramek formula and its revised form are larger than the standard values, but the SV values measured by EAP are in the range of the standard values. In other words, the method of EAP is more reliable. |
| |
| Keywords: | stroke volume (SV) method of impedance cardiogram (ICG) method of electric admittance plethysmogram (EAP) |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
